Tran Jenny, Alrajhi Ibrahim, Chang Doris, Sherwood Karen R, Keown Paul, Gill Jagbir, Kadatz Matthew, Gill John, Lan James H
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Front Genet. 2024 Apr 4;15:1383220. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1383220. eCollection 2024.
The optimal immunosuppression management in patients with a failed kidney transplant remains uncertain. This study analyzed the association of class II HLA eplet mismatches and maintenance immunosuppression with allosensitization after graft failure in a well characterized cohort of 21 patients who failed a first kidney transplant. A clinically meaningful increase in cPRA in this study was defined as the cPRA that resulted in 50% reduction in the compatible donor pool measured from the time of transplant failure until the time of repeat transplantation, death, or end of study. The median cPRA at the time of failure was 12.13% (interquartile ranges = 0.00%, 83.72%) which increased to 62.76% (IQR = 4.34%, 99.18%) during the median follow-up of 27 (IQR = 18, 39) months. High HLA-DQ eplet mismatches were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing a clinically meaningful increase in cPRA ( = 0.02) and DQ donor-specific antibody against the failed allograft ( = 0.02). We did not observe these associations in patients with high HLA-DR eplet mismatches. Most of the patients (88%) with a clinically meaningful increase in cPRA had both a high DQ eplet mismatch and a reduction in their immunosuppression, suggesting the association is modified by immunosuppression. The findings suggest HLA-DQ eplet mismatch analysis may serve as a useful tool to guide future clinical studies and trials which assess the management of immunosuppression in transplant failure patients who are repeat transplant candidates.
肾移植失败患者的最佳免疫抑制管理仍不明确。本研究分析了21例首次肾移植失败且特征明确的队列患者中,II类HLA表位错配和维持性免疫抑制与移植失败后致敏作用的关联。本研究中cPRA临床上有意义的增加定义为,从移植失败至再次移植、死亡或研究结束时,导致可兼容供体库减少50%的cPRA。失败时cPRA的中位数为12.13%(四分位间距=0.00%,83.72%),在27(四分位间距=18,39)个月的中位随访期间增加至62.76%(四分位间距=4.34%,99.18%)。高HLA-DQ表位错配与cPRA出现临床上有意义增加的风险增加显著相关(P=0.02),以及与针对失败同种异体移植物的DQ供体特异性抗体相关(P=0.02)。在高HLA-DR表位错配的患者中,我们未观察到这些关联。大多数cPRA出现临床上有意义增加的患者(88%)既有高DQ表位错配,又有免疫抑制的降低,提示该关联受免疫抑制的影响。这些发现表明,HLA-DQ表位错配分析可能是一种有用的工具,可用于指导未来评估重复移植候选的移植失败患者免疫抑制管理的临床研究和试验。