University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Division of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Jun;10(6):1037-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from human heart-derived cells have shown promise in suppressing inflammation and fibroblast proliferation. However, their precise benefits in atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention and the role of their antifibrotic/anti-inflammatory properties remain unclear.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of antiarrhythmic strategies to prevent postoperative AF using a rat model of sterile pericarditis. Specifically, we aimed to assess the efficacy of amiodarone (a classic antiarrhythmic drug), colchicine (an anti-inflammatory agent), and EVs derived from human heart-derived cells, which possess anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties, on AF induction, inflammation, and fibrosis progression.
Heart-derived cells were cultured from human atrial appendages under serum-free xenogen-free conditions. Middle-aged Sprague Dawley rats were randomized into different groups, including sham operation, sterile pericarditis with amiodarone treatment, sterile pericarditis with colchicine treatment (2 dose levels), and sterile pericarditis with intra-atrial injection of EVs or vehicle. Invasive electrophysiological testing was performed 3 days after surgery before sacrifice.
Sterile pericarditis increased the likelihood of inducing AF. Colchicine and EVs exhibited anti-inflammatory effects, but only EV treatment significantly reduced AF probability, whereas colchicine showed a positive trend without statistical significance. EVs and high-dose colchicine reduced atrial fibrosis by 46% ± 2% and 26% ± 2%, respectively. Amiodarone prevented AF induction but had no effect on inflammation or fibrosis.
In this study, both amiodarone and EVs prevented AF, whereas treatment with colchicine was ineffective. The additional anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects of EVs suggest their potential as a comprehensive therapeutic approach for AF prevention, surpassing the effects of amiodarone or colchicine.
从人源性心脏细胞中分离出的细胞外囊泡(EVs)在抑制炎症和纤维母细胞增殖方面显示出良好的效果。然而,它们在预防心房颤动(AF)方面的确切益处以及其抗纤维化/抗炎特性的作用仍不清楚。
本研究旨在通过无菌性心包炎大鼠模型进行头对头比较,以评估使用抗心律失常策略预防术后 AF 的效果。具体而言,我们旨在评估胺碘酮(一种经典的抗心律失常药物)、秋水仙碱(一种抗炎剂)以及具有抗炎和抗纤维化特性的人源性心脏细胞衍生的 EVs 在心源性细胞衍生的 EVs 对 AF 诱导、炎症和纤维化进展的影响。
在无血清无动物来源条件下,从人源性心耳中培养心脏源性细胞。将中年 Sprague Dawley 大鼠随机分为不同组,包括假手术组、无菌性心包炎伴胺碘酮治疗组、无菌性心包炎伴秋水仙碱治疗组(2 个剂量水平)以及无菌性心包炎伴心房内注射 EVs 或载体组。术后 3 天进行侵入性电生理测试,然后处死。
无菌性心包炎增加了诱导 AF 的可能性。秋水仙碱和 EVs 表现出抗炎作用,但只有 EV 治疗显著降低了 AF 的可能性,而秋水仙碱则显示出积极的趋势但无统计学意义。EVs 和高剂量秋水仙碱分别使心房纤维化减少了 46%±2%和 26%±2%。胺碘酮预防了 AF 的诱导,但对炎症或纤维化没有影响。
在这项研究中,胺碘酮和 EVs 均能预防 AF,而秋水仙碱治疗则无效。EVs 的额外抗炎和抗纤维化作用表明,它们可能成为预防 AF 的综合治疗方法,优于胺碘酮或秋水仙碱。