Suppr超能文献

确定上颌前牙宽度以达到美学效果:Mondelli 公式和 Albers 公式、审美比例和黄金比例的比较。

Determining the widths of the maxillary anterior teeth for esthetics: comparison of the Mondelli and Albers formulas, esthetic proportion, and golden ratio.

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2024 May-Jun;72(3):26-32.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare various formulas for idealized proportions of the maxillary incisors to the actual dimensions of natural teeth. The Mondelli formula 1 (MF1), Mondelli formula 2 (MF2), Albers formula (AF), esthetic proportion (EP) for width and height of anterior teeth, and golden ratio (GR) were calculated for a total of 50 dental students (30 women and 20 men) who participated in the study. The following measurements were obtained directly in the participant's mouth with a digital caliper: the mesiodistal and incisogingival dimensions of the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines; the intercanine distance; and the smile width. The participants were photographed, and the smile width was also measured on the photographs. The MF1 and MF2 were each calculated twice, using both direct measurements and photographic measurements. The projected central incisor widths calculated using the MF1, MF2, and AF were compared among themselves and against the actual measurements using analysis of variance and Fisher test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). The EP and GR were analyzed using descriptive statistics. There was a statistically significant difference between all of the widths projected by the formulas and the actual widths of the central incisors (P < 0.05). Whether calculated from a direct or a photographic measurement, the incisor widths projected by the MF1 and MF2 were statistically similar to each other (P > 0.05). The EP values were similar to those reported in the literature. Only 2% of the participants had an incisor width ratio (central incisor/lateral incisor) that matched the GR of 1.618, while 86% fell within the range of 1.2 to 1.4. Overall, the proportions calculated with the MF1, MF2, AF, EP, and GR did not exactly match the actual dimensions of natural teeth. The formulas and the proportions available in the literature can assist in esthetic planning, but the individual characteristics of each patient and expertise of the dentist should guide treatment for each case.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较上颌切牙理想比例的各种公式与天然牙实际尺寸之间的差异。我们为 50 名参与研究的牙科学生(30 名女性和 20 名男性)计算了 Mondelli 公式 1(MF1)、Mondelli 公式 2(MF2)、Albers 公式(AF)、前牙宽度和高度的美学比例(EP)以及黄金比例(GR)。我们直接在参与者的口腔中使用数字卡尺测量了以下尺寸:上颌中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙的近远中尺寸和切龈尺寸;尖牙间距离;以及微笑宽度。我们对参与者进行了拍照,并在照片上测量了微笑宽度。MF1 和 MF2 各进行了两次计算,分别使用直接测量值和照片测量值。使用方差分析和 Fisher 多重比较检验(α = 0.05)比较了使用 MF1、MF2 和 AF 计算的投影中央切牙宽度与实际测量值之间的差异。使用描述性统计分析 EP 和 GR。公式预测的切牙宽度与实际中央切牙宽度之间存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。无论是直接测量还是照片测量,MF1 和 MF2 预测的切牙宽度彼此之间没有统计学差异(P > 0.05)。EP 值与文献中报道的值相似。只有 2%的参与者的切牙宽度比(中切牙/侧切牙)与 GR 的 1.618 相匹配,而 86%的参与者落在 1.2 到 1.4 的范围内。总体而言,MF1、MF2、AF、EP 和 GR 计算的比例与天然牙的实际尺寸不完全匹配。文献中提供的公式和比例可以辅助美学规划,但每个患者的个体特征和牙医的专业知识应该指导每个病例的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验