Suppr超能文献

肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。

Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of agreed terminology and definitions in healthcare compromises communication, patient safety, optimal management of adverse events, and research progress. The purpose of this scoping review was to understand the terminologies used to describe central venous access devices (CVADs), associated complications and reasons for premature removal in people undergoing cancer treatment. It also sought to identify the definitional sources for complications and premature removal reasons. The objective was to map language and descriptions used and to explore opportunities for standardisation.

METHODS

A systematic search of MedLine, PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL Complete and Embase databases was performed. Eligibility criteria included, but were not limited to, adult patients with cancer, and studies published between 2017 and 2022. Articles were screened and data extracted in Covidence. Data charting included study characteristics and detailed information on CVADs including terminologies and definitional sources for complications and premature removal reasons. Descriptive statistics, tables and bar graphs were used to summarise charted data.

RESULTS

From a total of 2363 potentially eligible studies, 292 were included in the review. Most were observational studies (n = 174/60%). A total of 213 unique descriptors were used to refer to CVADs, with all reasons for premature CVAD removal defined in 84 (44%) of the 193 studies only, and complications defined in 56 (57%) of the 292 studies. Where available, definitions were author-derived and/or from national resources and/or other published studies.

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation in CVAD terminology and a lack of standard definitions for associated complications and premature removal reasons was identified. This scoping review demonstrates the need to standardise CVAD nomenclature to enhance communication between healthcare professionals as patients undergoing cancer treatment transition between acute and long-term care, to enhance patient safety and rigor of research protocols, and improve the capacity for data sharing.

摘要

背景

医疗保健领域缺乏术语和定义的共识会影响沟通、患者安全、不良事件的最佳管理以及研究进展。本范围综述的目的是了解用于描述接受癌症治疗人群的中心静脉通路装置 (CVAD)、相关并发症和提前移除原因的术语。它还旨在确定并发症和提前移除原因的定义来源。目的是绘制使用的语言和描述,并探索标准化的机会。

方法

对 MedLine、PubMed、Cochrane、CINAHL Complete 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括但不限于患有癌症的成年患者,以及发表于 2017 年至 2022 年期间的研究。在 Covidence 中筛选和提取数据。数据图表包括研究特征以及有关 CVAD 的详细信息,包括并发症和提前移除原因的术语和定义来源。使用描述性统计数据、表格和条形图总结图表数据。

结果

在总共 2363 篇潜在合格的研究中,有 292 篇被纳入综述。大多数为观察性研究 (n=174/60%)。共有 213 个独特的描述符用于指代 CVAD,在所有 193 项研究中,只有 84 项(44%)定义了提前移除 CVAD 的所有原因,在 292 项研究中只有 56 项(57%)定义了并发症。在可用的情况下,定义是作者衍生的,或者来自国家资源和/或其他已发表的研究。

结论

确定了 CVAD 术语的大量差异,以及与并发症和提前移除原因相关的缺乏标准定义。本范围综述表明需要标准化 CVAD 命名法,以增强接受癌症治疗的患者在急性和长期护理之间过渡时医护人员之间的沟通,增强患者安全性和研究方案的严谨性,并提高数据共享的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d565/11027380/c7b7b6a4a362/12885_2024_12099_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验