• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国产头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与商品头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗细菌感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam versus branded cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Entomological Biopharmaceutical R&D, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Anning First People's Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.

出版信息

J Chemother. 2024 Dec;36(8):698-708. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2024.2343961. Epub 2024 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1080/1120009X.2024.2343961
PMID:38644652
Abstract

This study aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam compared to the branded cefoperazone/sulbactam (Sulperazon) in treating bacterial infections through a meta-analysis. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP databases, and Clinical Trials database, resulting in the inclusion of 11 studies comprising 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs). Meta-analysis of the RCTs indicated no statistical differences in clinical success rates, clinical cure rates, microbiological eradication rates, and incidence of adverse reactions between the generic cefoperazone/sulbactam and the branded version. Findings from the RCSs aligned with those from the RCTs, demonstrating that generic versions of cefoperazone/sulbactam are equivalent in efficacy and safety to their branded counterparts in treating bacterial infections.

摘要

本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估与品牌头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(Sulperazon)相比,通用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗细菌感染的临床疗效和安全性。通过对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CNKI、万方、VIP 数据库和临床试验数据库进行检索,纳入了 11 项研究,包括 7 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 4 项回顾性队列研究(RCS)。对 RCT 的荟萃分析表明,在临床成功率、临床治愈率、微生物清除率以及不良反应发生率方面,通用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与品牌药物之间没有统计学差异。RCS 的结果与 RCT 的结果一致,表明通用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦在治疗细菌感染方面的疗效和安全性与品牌药物相当。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam versus branded cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.国产头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与商品头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗细菌感染的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Chemother. 2024 Dec;36(8):698-708. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2024.2343961. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam and other cephalosporins in the treatment of infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与其他头孢菌素治疗感染的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 25;104(17):e42182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042182.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Generic Formulation of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (Bacticep®) in Treatment of Infections at Siriraj Hospital.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(Bacticep®)通用制剂在诗里拉吉医院治疗感染的有效性和安全性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jan;99(1):8-14.
4
A multicentre clinical study on the injection of ceftriaxone/sulbactam compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.头孢曲松/舒巴坦与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗呼吸道和尿路感染的多中心临床研究。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013 Dec 9;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-38.
5
Efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam in empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦在发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19321. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019321.
6
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头孢哌酮舒巴坦治疗腹腔感染的临床疗效及安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;22(8):763-770. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.468. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
7
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Cefepime in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与头孢吡肟治疗医院获得性和医疗相关性肺炎的随机非劣效性试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jul 25;63(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00023-19. Print 2019 Aug.
8
A Non-inferiority Pilot Study Comparing the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Generic Wide-spectrum Antibiotic Use in Septic Oncology Patients.一项比较通用型广谱抗生素用于肿瘤脓毒症患者的临床疗效和安全性的非劣效性预试验研究。
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2015 Dec;65(12):635-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396884. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
9
[Clinical experience with the treatment of severe nosocomial infections by inhibitor-protected 3rd generation cephalosporin cefoperazone/sulbactam].[应用抑制剂保护的第三代头孢菌素头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗严重医院感染的临床经验]
Antibiot Khimioter. 2005;50(4):33-40.
10
Cefoperazone-sulbactam for treatment of intra-abdominal infections: results from a randomized, parallel group study in India.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦治疗腹腔内感染:印度一项随机平行组研究的结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):367-76. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of generic versus branded diacerein for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized control trial.通用型双醋瑞因与品牌型双醋瑞因治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 6;103(49):e40810. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040810.