Francis Daris, Kandaswami Kotteeswaran, Padinhare Veedu Pramod, Ponniah Subramanian Alex
Department of Physiotherapy, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, IND.
Department of Physiotherapy, Lourde Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Thaliparamba, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56553. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Background and objectives The study aimed to compare the efficacy of standard home care versus structured ankle mobility exercises in enhancing ankle and foot joint range of motion (ROM) among individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Additionally, it investigated the impact of foot intrinsic muscle strengthening exercises on hallux grip force in those with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DN). Materials and methods In a study of 200 patients with Diabetic Neuropathy (DN), selected from 345 screened diabetics with stable glucose levels and routine monitoring at a tertiary care facility, the efficacy of structured exercises versus standard care was evaluated. Participants, aged 40-70 years with mild neuropathic symptoms (neuropathy disability score of 3 to 5), were divided into two groups. Group 1 received standard care per International Diabetic Foot guidelines, while Group 2 performed targeted foot intrinsic muscle strengthening and ankle mobility exercises over eight weeks. The range of motion (ROM) for ankle and first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints and hallux grip force were measured, showing significant improvements in Group 2. Analysis was done using IBM SPSS. Results The average age of the individuals in group 1 (n=100) was 53.87±5.42 years, whereas the average age of the subjects in group 2 (n=100) was 54.23±4.69 years. The study included a total of 97 male participants, with 48 in group 1 and 49 in group 2. The groups exhibited homogeneity in terms of age, gender, duration of DM, and BMI (p>,0.05). When comparing the ROM for ankle dorsiflexion between the groups, it was shown that subjects in group 2 had a substantially higher ROM following exercise for both the right (27.97°±5.3° Vs 19.24°±2.54°) and left (28.55°±4.61° Vs 18.22°±1.14°) ankles compared to the patients in group 1 (p<,0.01). Nevertheless, there were statistically insignificant differences (p>,0.05) observed within the groups, both before and after the exercises, for all the variables examined except for right and left ankle dorsiflexion, and right ankle plantarflexion in group 2. Group 2 subjects exhibited a considerably greater hallux grip force compared to group 1 subjects. The mean enhanced paper grip strength for the right and left big toe of group 2 was 44±3.58 N and 43.2±2.62 N respectively. The mean enhanced paper grip force for the right and left big toe of group 1 was 38±3.11 N and 37.92±2.13 N respectively. A statistically highly significant difference was observed for hallux grip force between the groups (p<,0.01). Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that performing the foot intrinsic muscle strengthening and ankle mobility exercises on the foot and ankle joints can potentially enhance ROM and hallux grip force in patient groups with DN.
本研究旨在比较标准家庭护理与结构化踝关节活动度练习在增强糖尿病(DM)患者踝关节和足部关节活动范围(ROM)方面的效果。此外,还研究了足部固有肌强化练习对糖尿病周围神经病变(DN)患者拇趾握力的影响。
在一项对200例糖尿病神经病变(DN)患者的研究中,从345例经筛选的血糖水平稳定且在三级医疗机构接受常规监测的糖尿病患者中选取,评估结构化练习与标准护理的效果。年龄在40 - 70岁、有轻度神经病变症状(神经病变残疾评分为3至5分)的参与者被分为两组。第1组按照国际糖尿病足指南接受标准护理,而第2组在八周内进行有针对性的足部固有肌强化和踝关节活动度练习。测量踝关节和第一跖趾(MTP)关节的活动范围(ROM)以及拇趾握力,结果显示第2组有显著改善。使用IBM SPSS进行分析。
第1组(n = 100)个体的平均年龄为53.87±5.42岁,而第2组(n = 100)受试者的平均年龄为54.23±4.69岁。该研究共有97名男性参与者,第1组有48名,第2组有49名。两组在年龄、性别、糖尿病病程和体重指数方面表现出同质性(p>0.05)。比较两组之间踝关节背屈的ROM时发现,与第1组患者相比,第2组受试者在运动后右(27.97°±5.3°对19.24°±2.54°)、左(28.55°±4.61°对18.22°±1.14°)踝关节的ROM显著更高(p<0.01)。然而,除第2组的右、左踝关节背屈以及右踝关节跖屈外,在所有检查变量中,两组运动前后组内差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。第2组受试者的拇趾握力明显高于第1组受试者。第2组右、左大脚趾增强后的平均纸张握力分别为44±3.58 N和43.2±2.62 N。第1组右、左大脚趾增强后的平均纸张握力分别为38±3.11 N和37.92±2.13 N。两组之间拇趾握力差异具有高度统计学意义(p<0.01)。
本研究结果表明,对足部和踝关节进行足部固有肌强化和踝关节活动度练习可能会增强DN患者组的ROM和拇趾握力。