Dur Riza, Yalcinkaya Yilmaz Ayse, Ahat Betul, Kanat Pektas Mine
Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, TUR.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56574. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56574. eCollection 2024 Mar.
This study aims to evaluate the five-year experience of a single center regarding the total colpocleisis procedure.
This is a retrospective review of 24 women who underwent total colpocleisis at the study center between January 2017 and January 2023. Every participant was informed about this study, and written consent was obtained from each participant who then took Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Body Appreciation Scale-2 (BAS-2) and Decision Regret Scale (DRS) questionnaires consecutively.
Eight patients (33.3%) underwent total colpocleisis, whereas 16 patients (66.7%) had concomitant colpocleisis and vaginal hysterectomy. The number of total colpocleisis cases did not change significantly with respect to the past years (p=0.117). The patients who underwent total colpocleisis and the patients who had concurrent colpocleisis and hysterectomy were statistically similar with respect to age, gravidity, chronic disease, blood group, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, anesthesia type, surgery timing and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values (p>0.05 for all). Operative time was significantly shorter in patients who had colpocleisis alone (p=0.001). Both patient groups were also statistically similar in aspects of blood loss, transfusion need, hospital stay, postoperative complications and follow-up time as well as PFDI-20, BAS-2 and DRS scores (p>0.05 for all). Endometrial atrophy (56.3%), endometrial hyperplasia (18.8%) and adenomyosis (12.5%) were the most common histopathological findings detected in vaginal hysterectomy specimens.
The combination of vaginal hysterectomy and total colpocleisis appears as a safe and efficient approach which does not contribute to the surgery-related morbidity despite the significantly longer operative time.
本研究旨在评估单中心关于全阴道闭合术的五年经验。
这是一项对2017年1月至2023年1月期间在研究中心接受全阴道闭合术的24名女性进行的回顾性研究。每位参与者均被告知本研究,并获得了每位参与者的书面同意,然后她们依次填写盆底困扰量表-20(PFDI-20)、身体欣赏量表-2(BAS-2)和决策后悔量表(DRS)问卷。
8名患者(33.3%)接受了全阴道闭合术,而16名患者(66.7%)同时进行了阴道闭合术和阴道子宫切除术。全阴道闭合术的病例数与过去几年相比没有显著变化(p = 0.117)。接受全阴道闭合术的患者与同时进行阴道闭合术和子宫切除术的患者在年龄、妊娠次数、慢性病、血型、美国麻醉医师协会分级、麻醉类型、手术时机以及术前和术后血红蛋白值方面在统计学上相似(所有p>0.05)。单纯进行阴道闭合术的患者手术时间明显更短(p = 0.001)。两组患者在失血量、输血需求、住院时间、术后并发症和随访时间以及PFDI-20、BAS-2和DRS评分方面在统计学上也相似(所有p>0.05)。子宫内膜萎缩(56.3%)、子宫内膜增生(18.8%)和子宫腺肌病(12.5%)是在阴道子宫切除标本中检测到的最常见组织病理学发现。
阴道子宫切除术和全阴道闭合术的联合似乎是一种安全有效的方法,尽管手术时间明显更长,但不会增加手术相关的发病率。