Does knowledge of blood calcium concentration at 2 days postpartum affect decisions of calcium supplementation?

Delaying oral Ca supplementation might benefit cows with low blood Ca concentrations at 4 d in milk (DIM), a time when reduced blood total Ca (tCa) is associated with negative health and production outcomes. To implement a targeted approach to manage subclinical hypocalcemia (SCH) at the herd level, it is important to identify which cows benefit from supplemental Ca. Therefore, our objective was to determine if SCH diagnosis at 2 DIM could inform decisions of oral Ca supplementation at 2 and 3 DIM based on milk yield and 4 DIM blood Ca concentration. Data were analyzed from a previously conducted randomized controlled trial on multiparous cows (n = 518) from 4 farms in New York State. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups at calving: (1) control (CON; no Ca supplementation, n = 259) or (2) bolus (BOL; 43 g of oral Ca administered at 2 and 3 DIM postcalving, n = 259). For each parity group (2, 3, 4+), we used generalized linear mixed models to identify serum tCa concentrations at 2 DIM that maximized the difference in milk yield to diagnose SCH. Cows were classified as normocalcemic (NC; parity 2 tCa >1.9 mmol/L, parity 3 tCa >1.87 mmol/L, n = 327; parity ≥4 had no defining threshold) or SCH (parity 2 tCa ≤1.9 mmol/L, parity 3 tCa ≤1.87 mmol/L, n = 58; parity ≥4 had no defining threshold). Parity 2 and 3 cows were further classified into 1 of 4 SCH-treatment groups (SCHTRT) based on 2 DIM SCH status and random treatment allocation: (1) NC-CON, n = 165, (2) SCH-CON, n = 28, (3) NC-BOL, n = 162, or (4) SCH-BOL, n = 30. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze the difference in milk yield for the first 10 wk of lactation and tCa at 4 DIM between SCHTRT groups with separate analyses performed for parities 2 and 3. Mean milk yield differed between SCHTRT groups for both parities. For parity 2, SCH-CON and SCH-BOL cows produced more milk than NC-CON and NC-BOL cows with SCH-CON producing 50.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48.4, 53.4) kg/d, SCH-BOL 51.7 (49.1, 54.2) kg/d, NC-CON 47.5 (46.3, 48.7) kg/d, and NC-BOL 47.2 (45.8, 48.5) kg/d of milk. Milk yield was also different between SCHTRT groups for parity 3 with SCH-BOL cows producing more milk than NC-CON and NC-BOL cows. In parity 3, SCH-BOL cows produced 56.3 (95% CI = 53.1, 59.3) kg/d, SCH-CON 51.7 (48.6, 54.7) kg/d, NC-BOL 50.6 (49.0, 52.2) kg/d, and NC-CON 48.7 (46.9, 50.5) kg/d of milk. For both parities, SCH-CON and SCH-BOL cows had lower tCa at 2 DIM than NC-CON and NC-BOL cows. At 4 DIM, tCa concentrations were similar for all SCHTRT groups respective to parity. Our results suggest that although delayed Ca bolus administration does not improve blood Ca concentration when compared with controls, it does support increased milk production in parity 3 cows regardless of Ca status at 2 DIM. Thus, knowledge of blood Ca at 2 DIM should not affect decisions of Ca supplementation in this parity of cows.