Scott Ashlyn, Le Heiget Arielle, Stefanson Reyna, Ahloy-Dallaire Jamie, King Meagan
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3T 2N2.
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada, G1V 0A6.
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Apr 9;8:txae053. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae053. eCollection 2024.
When weaned in commercial operations, piglets are not only separated from their sow but also mixed with unfamiliar pigs in an unfamiliar environment with a new diet. These abrupt changes can be stressful for piglets, often having negative welfare consequences. Our objective was to study the effects of early-life preweaning socialization and object enrichment in the preweaning environment. We compared piglet performance, behavior, and welfare across six treatments that combined multi-litter group size (1 vs. 2 vs. 4 litters) and burlap (yes vs. no). We recorded piglet behavior and lesion-scored sows and piglets. Normal conforming data, expressed per experimental unit (and behavior data were averaged over time), were analyzed by ANOVA. When given the opportunity in the sow barn, piglets in multi-litter groups socialized with other litters. Burlap use ( = 0.08) was observed in < 5% of the observations but tended to increase in mixed litter groups. Cross-sucking was observed in ~12% of the observations within mixed litter groups and tended to increase with mixed group size ( = 0.08). While there was no difference in the proportion of piglets nursing (> 0.10), piglets were less active in the single crate groups and most active in the groups of two litters mixed (= 0.03). Additionally, observed piglet/sow biting behaviors did not differ between treatments; however, piglet-piglet biting ( = 0.07), and pen object manipulation ( = 0.07) tended to be observed more frequently in non-enriched groups. Piglet displacements were observed more often in non-enriched groups around the pen ( = 0.03) but tended to be observed more often in enriched groups at the teat ( = 0.07). Preweaning socialization and object enrichment had no impact on the average number of piglets weaned per sow or total piglet mortality ( > 0.10). However, the proportion of laid-on piglets decreased as the number of mixed litters increased ( = 0.02). The average number of lesions per piglet did not differ between treatments. Although the final lesion scores of sow teat and udder condition did not differ between treatments ( > 0.10), sow udder scores tended to worsen more in the single litters than in the mixed litters ( = 0.08). Overall, social and object enrichment allows piglets to socialize at a younger age and to redirect their attention toward an object (burlap) which does not negatively impact piglet or sow performance, or behavior, and may improve piglet welfare around weaning.
在商业养殖中仔猪断奶时,它们不仅会与母猪分离,还会在陌生环境中与陌生的猪混养,并食用新的饲料。这些突然的变化可能会给仔猪带来压力,常常产生负面的福利后果。我们的目标是研究断奶前早期社交和断奶前环境中物品丰富化的影响。我们比较了六种处理方式下仔猪的生长性能、行为和福利状况,这六种处理方式结合了不同窝仔猪的组合数量(1窝、2窝、4窝)和是否使用粗麻布。我们记录了仔猪的行为,并对母猪和仔猪进行了损伤评分。以每个实验单元表示的正常合格数据(行为数据随时间进行了平均),通过方差分析进行分析。在母猪舍中有机会时,多窝仔猪组中的仔猪会与其他窝的仔猪进行社交。在不到5%的观察中发现了粗麻布的使用情况(P = 0.08),但在混合窝组中使用频率有增加的趋势。在混合窝组中,约12%的观察中发现了交叉吮乳现象,并且随着混合组规模的增加有增加的趋势(P = 0.08)。虽然哺乳仔猪的比例没有差异(P>0.10),但单栏饲养组的仔猪活动较少,两窝仔猪混合组的仔猪活动最为活跃(P = 0.03)。此外,各处理间观察到的仔猪/母猪咬斗行为没有差异;然而,非丰富化组中仔猪间咬斗(P = 0.07)和围栏物品操控行为(P = 0.07)的观察频率往往更高。在围栏周围,非丰富化组中仔猪被驱赶的情况更常被观察到(P = 0.03),但在乳头处,丰富化组中这种情况更常被观察到(P = 0.07)。断奶前社交和物品丰富化对每头母猪断奶仔猪的平均数量或仔猪总死亡率没有影响(P>0.10)。然而,随着混合窝数量的增加,被压仔猪的比例下降(P = 0.02)。各处理间每头仔猪的平均损伤数量没有差异。虽然各处理间母猪乳头和乳房状况的最终损伤评分没有差异(P>0.10),但单窝组母猪的乳房评分比混合窝组恶化得更明显(P = 0.08)。总体而言,社交和物品丰富化使仔猪能够在更小的年龄进行社交,并将注意力转向一个物品(粗麻布),这对仔猪或母猪的性能、行为没有负面影响,并且可能改善断奶前后仔猪的福利。