Porchak Emily, Oudshoorn Abe, Modanloo Shokoufeh, Gilliland Jason, McLean Sarah, Thuemler Natasha, Ariba Olayinka, Rolfe Steven
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(4):1178-1209. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.a912712.
Some populations have increased risks of experiencing chronic homelessness related to complex health and social needs combined with system failures. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) may improve housing and health outcomes for this population. To understand the scope of the literature on PSH, this scoping review uses Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework enhanced by Levac and the Joanna Briggs Institute. A search was conducted across multiple databases for existing research on PSH. Forty-one studies were included, and five themes were generated: PSH sustains housing for most people; PSH is costly to implement, but costs can be recouped; PSH facilitates belonging and safety; single-site programs have social challenges but also provide efficiency and improve social networks; and visible on-site staff fundamentally helps those with highest support needs. Permanent supportive housing has been shown to be effective for those with the highest health and social support needs and is required to help prevent and end homelessness.
一些人群因复杂的健康和社会需求以及系统失灵,面临着长期无家可归风险增加的问题。永久性支持性住房(PSH)可能会改善这部分人群的住房和健康状况。为了解关于PSH的文献范围,本综述采用了由Levac和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所改进的Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架。对多个数据库进行了搜索,以查找关于PSH的现有研究。纳入了41项研究,并生成了五个主题:PSH为大多数人维持住房;PSH实施成本高昂,但成本可以收回;PSH促进归属感和安全感;单站点项目存在社会挑战,但也提高了效率并改善了社交网络;可见的现场工作人员从根本上帮助了那些有最高支持需求的人。永久性支持性住房已被证明对那些有最高健康和社会支持需求的人有效,并且是预防和结束无家可归现象所必需的。