Lit Med. 2023;41(2):391-415. doi: 10.1353/lm.2023.a921569.
Storytelling is good for us-or so we are told. This article examines two memoirs, by Hilary Mantel and Susanna Kaysen, in which narrating experiences of gynecological pain provokes shame and deepens pain. By attending to shame as a textual presence, I intervene in a longstanding debate about how to make sense of pain and illness. Shame, I argue, reveals the presence of multiple (and often contrasting) illness narratives; I analyze these narratives, and their interplay, across Mantel's and Kaysen's memoirs. As scholarship moves beyond, past, or post-narrative, I urge us to stay: to interrogate the ways in which illness narratives interact-amplifying some stories and storytellers whilst fragmenting or silencing others-and to examine the responsibility we all have within this collective sense-making.
我们常被告知,讲故事对我们有好处。本文审视了希拉里·曼特尔和苏珊娜·凯森的两部回忆录,在这两部回忆录中,叙述妇科疼痛的经历会引发羞耻感,并加深疼痛。通过关注羞耻感作为一种文本存在,我介入了一个关于如何理解疼痛和疾病的长期争论。我认为,羞耻感揭示了多种(通常是相互矛盾的)疾病叙事的存在;我分析了这些叙事以及它们在曼特尔和凯森的回忆录中的相互作用。随着学术研究超越、过去或后叙事,我敦促我们留下来:质疑疾病叙事相互作用的方式——放大一些故事和讲述者,同时使其他故事碎片化或沉默,并审视我们所有人在这个集体意义构建中所承担的责任。