Menini Maria, Delucchi Francesca, Bagnasco Francesco, Baldi Domenico, Canullo Luigi, Setti Paolo, Migliorati Marco, Simetti Enrico, Pesce Paolo
Division of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Private Practice, 16012 Genova, Italy.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;12(4):111. doi: 10.3390/dj12040111.
Restorative materials might significantly affect load transmission in peri-implant bone. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the shock absorption capacity of two different polymeric materials to be used for implant-supported prostheses.
A masticatory robot was used to compare the shock absorption capacity of veneered and non-veneered polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), Pekktonivory (Cendres+Mètaux), and the glass fiber-reinforced composite (GFRC), TRINIA (Bicon). Five identical sample crowns for each of the three groups were tested. Forces transmitted at the simulated peri-implant bone were recorded and statistically analyzed.
The statistical analysis of forces transmitted at the simulated dental implant revealed significant differences between the materials tested and between these materials and zirconia, glass ceramic, composite resin, and acrylic resin. Only differences between PEKK and veneered PEKK and between PEKK and one of the previously tested composite resins were not statistically significant. PEKK samples demonstrated significantly greater shock absorption capacity compared to GFRC.
PEKK revealed optimal shock absorption capacity. Further studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy in the case of long-span prostheses with reduced prosthetic volume.
修复材料可能会显著影响种植体周围骨组织的负荷传递。本研究的目的是评估两种不同的用于种植体支持修复体的聚合材料的减震能力。
使用咀嚼机器人比较 veneered 和 non-veneered 聚醚酮酮(PEKK)、Pekktonivory(Cendres+Mètaux)以及玻璃纤维增强复合材料(GFRC)、TRINIA(Bicon)的减震能力。对三组中的每组五个相同的样本冠进行测试。记录并统计分析在模拟种植体周围骨组织传递的力。
对在模拟牙种植体处传递的力进行的统计分析显示,测试材料之间以及这些材料与氧化锆、玻璃陶瓷、复合树脂和丙烯酸树脂之间存在显著差异。仅 PEKK 与 veneered PEKK 之间以及 PEKK 与之前测试的一种复合树脂之间的差异无统计学意义。与 GFRC 相比,PEKK 样本表现出显著更高的减震能力。
PEKK 显示出最佳的减震能力。需要进一步研究以评估其在修复体体积减小的长跨度修复体情况下的疗效。