• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果不调整检测误差,联合多重分析面板检测结果对疾病流行率的估计很差。

Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error.

机构信息

Bristol Vaccine Centre, Schools of Population Health Sciences and of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 26;20(4):e1012062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062
PMID:38669293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11078360/
Abstract

Multiplex panel tests identify many individual pathogens at once, using a set of component tests. In some panels the number of components can be large. If the panel is detecting causative pathogens for a single syndrome or disease then we might estimate the burden of that disease by combining the results of the panel, for example determining the prevalence of pneumococcal pneumonia as caused by many individual pneumococcal serotypes. When we are dealing with multiplex test panels with many components, test error in the individual components of a panel, even when present at very low levels, can cause significant overall error. Uncertainty in the sensitivity and specificity of the individual tests, and statistical fluctuations in the numbers of false positives and false negatives, will cause large uncertainty in the combined estimates of disease prevalence. In many cases this can be a source of significant bias. In this paper we develop a mathematical framework to characterise this issue, we determine expressions for the sensitivity and specificity of panel tests. In this we identify a counter-intuitive relationship between panel test sensitivity and disease prevalence that means panel tests become more sensitive as prevalence increases. We present novel statistical methods that adjust for bias and quantify uncertainty in prevalence estimates from panel tests, and use simulations to test these methods. As multiplex testing becomes more commonly used for screening in routine clinical practice, accumulation of test error due to the combination of large numbers of test results needs to be identified and corrected for.

摘要

多重检测面板一次性识别多种病原体,使用一组组件检测。在某些面板中,组件的数量可能很大。如果面板正在检测单一综合征或疾病的病原体,那么我们可以通过组合面板的结果来估计该疾病的负担,例如通过确定由许多个别肺炎球菌血清型引起的肺炎球菌性肺炎的流行率。当我们处理具有许多组件的多重检测面板时,即使在非常低的水平下,面板中各个组件的检测错误也会导致整体错误显著增加。个别检测的敏感性和特异性的不确定性以及假阳性和假阴性数量的统计波动,将导致疾病流行率的综合估计值存在很大的不确定性。在许多情况下,这可能是一个重要的偏差来源。在本文中,我们开发了一个数学框架来描述这个问题,确定了面板检测的敏感性和特异性的表达式。在这方面,我们发现了一个与面板检测敏感性和疾病流行率之间的反直觉关系,即随着流行率的增加,面板检测变得更加敏感。我们提出了新颖的统计方法,可以校正面板检测中由于大量检测结果组合引起的偏差,并量化流行率估计的不确定性,并通过模拟来测试这些方法。随着多重检测在常规临床实践中的筛查中越来越普遍,需要识别和纠正由于大量检测结果组合而导致的检测错误的积累。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/e38eb6b45960/pcbi.1012062.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/4481fb205401/pcbi.1012062.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/e647a89ed7ae/pcbi.1012062.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/210e376bd1f9/pcbi.1012062.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/94efba1798cb/pcbi.1012062.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/e38eb6b45960/pcbi.1012062.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/4481fb205401/pcbi.1012062.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/e647a89ed7ae/pcbi.1012062.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/210e376bd1f9/pcbi.1012062.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/94efba1798cb/pcbi.1012062.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a31/11078360/e38eb6b45960/pcbi.1012062.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined multiplex panel test results are a poor estimate of disease prevalence without adjustment for test error.如果不调整检测误差,联合多重分析面板检测结果对疾病流行率的估计很差。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 26;20(4):e1012062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012062. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Latex agglutination test for diagnosing pneumococcal pneumonia in children in developing countries.发展中国家儿童肺炎球菌肺炎诊断的乳胶凝集试验
BMJ. 1989 Apr 22;298(6680):1061-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1061.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Alere BinaxNOW Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen Test: Diagnostic Sensitivity for Adult Pneumococcal Pneumonia and Relationship to Specific Serotypes.Alere BinaxNOW 肺炎球菌尿抗原检测:成人肺炎球菌肺炎的诊断敏感性及其与特定血清型的关系。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00787-17. Print 2018 Feb.
5
Development and Validation of a Sensitive and Robust Multiplex Antigen Capture Assay to Quantify Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype-Specific Capsular Polysaccharides in Urine.开发并验证了一种灵敏且稳健的多重抗原捕获检测方法,用于定量尿液中的肺炎链球菌血清型特异性荚膜多糖。
mSphere. 2022 Aug 31;7(4):e0011422. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00114-22. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
6
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.SARS-CoV-2 感染的普遍筛查:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718.
7
Burden of disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children younger than 5 years: global estimates.5岁以下儿童肺炎链球菌所致疾病负担:全球估计数
Lancet. 2009 Sep 12;374(9693):893-902. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61204-6.
8
Estimating the burden of pneumococcal pneumonia among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic techniques.评估成人肺炎链球菌性肺炎的负担:诊断技术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060273. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
The Impact of Increasing Disease Prevalence, False Omissions, and Diagnostic Uncertainty on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Test Performance.不断增加的疾病流行率、假阴性漏报和诊断不确定性对 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)检测性能的影响。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;145(7):797-813. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0716-SA.
10
Pneumococcal pneumonia prevalence among adults with severe acute respiratory illness in Thailand - comparison of Bayesian latent class modeling and conventional analysis.泰国重症急性呼吸道疾病成人患者中肺炎球菌性肺炎的流行情况——贝叶斯潜在类别建模与传统分析的比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 15;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4067-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the accuracy of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) incidence estimates among hospitalised adults in Bristol, UK.提高英国布里斯托尔住院成人呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)发病率估计的准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1050. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11292-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Serotype Distribution and Disease Severity in Adults Hospitalized with Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection, Bristol and Bath, UK, 2006‒2022.2006 年至 2022 年,英国布里斯托尔和巴斯因肺炎链球菌感染住院的成年人的血清型分布和疾病严重程度。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;29(10):1953-64. doi: 10.3201/eid2910.230519.
2
Bayesian Analysis of Tests with Unknown Specificity and Sensitivity.对特异性和敏感性未知的检测进行贝叶斯分析。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2020 Aug 13;69(5):1269-1283. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12435. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
PepSeq: a fully in vitro platform for highly multiplexed serology using customizable DNA-barcoded peptide libraries.
PepSeq:一种使用可定制 DNA 条码肽文库进行高度多重化血清学检测的完全体外平台。
Nat Protoc. 2023 Feb;18(2):396-423. doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00766-8. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel RP2.1 for SARS-CoV-2 detection: The pitfalls.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的BioFire FilmArray呼吸道检测板RP2.1:陷阱
J Infect. 2022 Nov;85(5):e149-e151. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.07.030. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
5
Bias correction methods for test-negative designs in the presence of misclassification.存在错误分类时检验阴性设计的偏倚校正方法。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Sep 8;148:e216. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002058.
6
Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods for prevalence estimation under misclassification.在存在错误分类的情况下,贝叶斯和频率派方法在患病率估计中的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09177-4.
7
Multicenter Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia/Pneumonia Plus Panel for Detection and Quantification of Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.BioFire FilmArray肺炎/肺炎加检测板用于下呼吸道感染病原体检测和定量的多中心评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jun 24;58(7). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00128-20.
8
Qualification and Clinical Validation of an Immunodiagnostic Assay for Detecting 11 Additional Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype-specific Polysaccharides in Human Urine.用于检测人尿液中 11 种额外肺炎链球菌血清型特异性多糖的免疫诊断检测方法的鉴定和临床验证。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):e430-e438. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa158.
9
Comparison of the Biofire FilmArray Respiratory Panel, Seegene AnyplexII RV16, and Argene for the detection of respiratory viruses.比较生物梅里埃 FilmArray 呼吸道Panel 检测试剂盒、赛沛 AnyplexII RV16 和 Argene 检测试剂盒在呼吸道病毒检测中的性能。
J Clin Virol. 2018 Sep;106:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
10
Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples.多中心评价生物梅里埃 FilmArray 呼吸道Panel 2 检测鼻咽拭子样本中病毒和细菌
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01945-17. Print 2018 Jun.