University of Alberta, Department of Biological Sciences, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
University of Alberta, Department of Biological Sciences, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
Int J Parasitol. 2024 Sep;54(11):551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Parasites can indirectly impact hosts through non-consumptive effects (NCEs) via changes in behaviour, morphology, and/or physiology. These responses can be understood in terms of the ecology of fear (ectoparasites) or the ecology of disgust (endoparasites) framework. We tested the hypothesis that NCEs of parasite exposure (e.g., parasite avoidance and defense) trade off with other important behaviours such as feeding and resting. We predicted that when exposed to parasites (without infection), hosts will increase their defensive behaviors at the expense of feeding. We also posited that history of exposure (without infection), or previous infection would impact the expression of these NCEs. The study system involves a cactophilic fruit fly (Drosophila nigrospiracula) and a naturally occurring parasitic mite (Macrocheles subbadius). First, we assessed how prior mite exposure affected fly behaviour in response to current parasite exposure. Mite presence resulted in increased grooming and movement, but exposure history did not affect these behaviours. However, the interaction between previous and current exposure influenced host feeding and resting behaviours. We found that previously exposed flies increased feeding and decreased resting upon a secondary mite exposure. In a second experiment, we tested the role of infection history on current parasite exposure. Compared with naïve flies, previously infected flies were expected to increase defensive behaviours upon secondary exposure. Flies increased defensive and ambulatory behaviour in the presence of mites, and consequently less time was spent resting but feeding was unaffected. None of the behaviours measured were affected by previous infection status. In general, current parasite exposure resulted in NCEs. Moreover, our results showed that previous exposure (without infection) to parasites may have an even stronger effect upon secondary exposure than infection history. Our study highlights the importance of the ecology of fear and the role that exposure and infection history plays in generating NCEs of parasitism.
寄生虫可以通过行为、形态和/或生理的非消耗性效应(NCEs)间接影响宿主。这些反应可以根据恐惧生态学(外寄生虫)或厌恶生态学(内寄生虫)框架来理解。我们测试了寄生虫暴露(例如寄生虫回避和防御)与其他重要行为(如进食和休息)之间存在非消耗性效应(NCEs)的假设。我们预测,当宿主暴露于寄生虫(未感染)时,它们会增加防御行为,而牺牲进食。我们还假设,暴露史(未感染)或先前的感染会影响这些 NCEs 的表达。研究系统涉及一种嗜仙人掌果实蝇(Drosophila nigrospiracula)和一种自然发生的寄生螨(Macrocheles subbadius)。首先,我们评估了先前螨暴露如何影响蝇对当前寄生虫暴露的行为反应。螨的存在导致了更多的梳理和运动,但暴露史并没有影响这些行为。然而,先前和当前暴露的相互作用影响了宿主的进食和休息行为。我们发现,先前暴露的果蝇在二次螨暴露时增加了进食,减少了休息。在第二个实验中,我们测试了感染史对当前寄生虫暴露的作用。与天真的果蝇相比,以前感染过的果蝇在二次暴露时预计会增加防御行为。果蝇在有螨虫的情况下增加了防御和走动行为,因此休息时间减少,但进食不受影响。测量的行为都不受先前感染状态的影响。总的来说,当前寄生虫暴露会导致 NCEs。此外,我们的结果表明,以前暴露(未感染)于寄生虫可能对二次暴露产生比感染史更强的影响。我们的研究强调了恐惧生态学的重要性,以及暴露和感染史在产生寄生虫寄生的 NCEs 中所扮演的角色。