Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (L.M., J.B., K.M.C., W.O., M.A., C.D.).
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, CA (L.M., H.O., K.T., W.F.F.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jul;17(7):e013860. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013860. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Reliable assessment of coronary microvascular function is essential. Techniques to measure absolute coronary blood flow are promising but need validation. The objectives of this study were: first, to validate the potential of saline infusion to generate maximum hyperemia in vivo. Second, to validate absolute coronary blood flow measured with continuous coronary thermodilution at high (40-50 mL/min) infusion speeds and asses its safety.
Fourteen closed-chest sheep underwent absolute coronary blood flow measurements with increasing saline infusion speeds at different dosages under general anesthesia. An additional 7 open-chest sheep underwent these measurements with epicardial Doppler flow probes. Coronary flows were compared with reactive hyperemia after 45 s of coronary occlusion.
Twenty milliliters per minute of saline infusion induced a significantly lower hyperemic coronary flow (140 versus 191 mL/min; =0.0165), lower coronary flow reserve (1.82 versus 3.21; ≤0.0001), and higher coronary resistance (655 versus 422 woods units; =0.0053) than coronary occlusion. On the other hand, 30 mL/min of saline infusion resulted in hyperemic coronary flow (196 versus 192 mL/min; =0.8292), coronary flow reserve (2.77 versus 3.21; =0.1107), and coronary resistance (415 versus 422 woods units; =0.9181) that were not different from coronary occlusion. Hyperemic coronary flow was 40.7% with 5 mL/min, 40.8% with 10 mL/min, 73.1% with 20 mL/min, 102.3% with 30 mL/min, 99.0% with 40 mL/min, and 98.0% with 50 mL/min of saline infusion when compared with postocclusive hyperemic flow. There was a significant bias toward flow overestimation (Bland-Altman: bias±SD, -73.09±30.52; 95% limits of agreement, -132.9 to -13.27) with 40 to 50 mL/min of saline. Occasionally, ischemic changes resulted in ventricular fibrillation (9.5% with 50 mL/min) at higher infusion rates.
Continuous saline infusion of 30 mL/min but not 20 mL/min induced maximal hyperemia. Absolute coronary blood flow measured with saline infusion speeds of 40 to 50 mL/min was not accurate and not safe.
可靠的冠状动脉微血管功能评估至关重要。测量绝对冠状动脉血流的技术很有前途,但需要验证。本研究的目的是:首先,验证在体盐输注产生最大充血的潜力。其次,验证以高(40-50mL/min)输注速度进行连续冠状动脉温差测量的绝对冠状动脉血流,并评估其安全性。
14 只在全麻下进行绝对冠状动脉血流测量,逐渐增加盐水输注速度,并采用不同剂量。另外 7 只开胸绵羊用心外膜多普勒流量探头进行这些测量。冠状动脉血流量与冠状动脉闭塞 45 秒后的再充血进行比较。
20mL/min 的盐水输注诱导的充血性冠状动脉血流量(140 比 191mL/min;=0.0165)、冠状动脉血流储备(1.82 比 3.21;≤0.0001)和冠状动脉阻力(655 比 422 伍德单位;=0.0053)均显著低于冠状动脉闭塞。另一方面,30mL/min 的盐水输注导致充血性冠状动脉血流量(196 比 192mL/min;=0.8292)、冠状动脉血流储备(2.77 比 3.21;=0.1107)和冠状动脉阻力(415 比 422 伍德单位;=0.9181)与冠状动脉闭塞无差异。与闭塞后充血性血流相比,5mL/min 时为 40.7%,10mL/min 时为 40.8%,20mL/min 时为 73.1%,30mL/min 时为 102.3%,40mL/min 时为 99.0%,50mL/min 时为 98.0%。当以 40 至 50mL/min 的盐输注进行比较时,存在显著的流量高估偏差(Bland-Altman:偏差±SD,-73.09±30.52;95%一致性区间,-132.9 至-13.27)。在更高的输注率下,偶尔会因缺血变化导致心室颤动(50mL/min 时为 9.5%)。
30mL/min 但不是 20mL/min 的连续盐水输注可诱导最大充血。以 40 至 50mL/min 的盐水输注速度测量的绝对冠状动脉血流既不准确也不安全。