Suppr超能文献

优化绝对冠状动脉血流测量以评估微血管功能:在体验证充血和更高的灌注速度。

Optimization of Absolute Coronary Blood Flow Measurements to Assess Microvascular Function: In Vivo Validation of Hyperemia and Higher Infusion Speeds.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (L.M., J.B., K.M.C., W.O., M.A., C.D.).

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, CA (L.M., H.O., K.T., W.F.F.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jul;17(7):e013860. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013860. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable assessment of coronary microvascular function is essential. Techniques to measure absolute coronary blood flow are promising but need validation. The objectives of this study were: first, to validate the potential of saline infusion to generate maximum hyperemia in vivo. Second, to validate absolute coronary blood flow measured with continuous coronary thermodilution at high (40-50 mL/min) infusion speeds and asses its safety.

METHODS

Fourteen closed-chest sheep underwent absolute coronary blood flow measurements with increasing saline infusion speeds at different dosages under general anesthesia. An additional 7 open-chest sheep underwent these measurements with epicardial Doppler flow probes. Coronary flows were compared with reactive hyperemia after 45 s of coronary occlusion.

RESULTS

Twenty milliliters per minute of saline infusion induced a significantly lower hyperemic coronary flow (140 versus 191 mL/min; =0.0165), lower coronary flow reserve (1.82 versus 3.21; ≤0.0001), and higher coronary resistance (655 versus 422 woods units; =0.0053) than coronary occlusion. On the other hand, 30 mL/min of saline infusion resulted in hyperemic coronary flow (196 versus 192 mL/min; =0.8292), coronary flow reserve (2.77 versus 3.21; =0.1107), and coronary resistance (415 versus 422 woods units; =0.9181) that were not different from coronary occlusion. Hyperemic coronary flow was 40.7% with 5 mL/min, 40.8% with 10 mL/min, 73.1% with 20 mL/min, 102.3% with 30 mL/min, 99.0% with 40 mL/min, and 98.0% with 50 mL/min of saline infusion when compared with postocclusive hyperemic flow. There was a significant bias toward flow overestimation (Bland-Altman: bias±SD, -73.09±30.52; 95% limits of agreement, -132.9 to -13.27) with 40 to 50 mL/min of saline. Occasionally, ischemic changes resulted in ventricular fibrillation (9.5% with 50 mL/min) at higher infusion rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous saline infusion of 30 mL/min but not 20 mL/min induced maximal hyperemia. Absolute coronary blood flow measured with saline infusion speeds of 40 to 50 mL/min was not accurate and not safe.

摘要

背景

可靠的冠状动脉微血管功能评估至关重要。测量绝对冠状动脉血流的技术很有前途,但需要验证。本研究的目的是:首先,验证在体盐输注产生最大充血的潜力。其次,验证以高(40-50mL/min)输注速度进行连续冠状动脉温差测量的绝对冠状动脉血流,并评估其安全性。

方法

14 只在全麻下进行绝对冠状动脉血流测量,逐渐增加盐水输注速度,并采用不同剂量。另外 7 只开胸绵羊用心外膜多普勒流量探头进行这些测量。冠状动脉血流量与冠状动脉闭塞 45 秒后的再充血进行比较。

结果

20mL/min 的盐水输注诱导的充血性冠状动脉血流量(140 比 191mL/min;=0.0165)、冠状动脉血流储备(1.82 比 3.21;≤0.0001)和冠状动脉阻力(655 比 422 伍德单位;=0.0053)均显著低于冠状动脉闭塞。另一方面,30mL/min 的盐水输注导致充血性冠状动脉血流量(196 比 192mL/min;=0.8292)、冠状动脉血流储备(2.77 比 3.21;=0.1107)和冠状动脉阻力(415 比 422 伍德单位;=0.9181)与冠状动脉闭塞无差异。与闭塞后充血性血流相比,5mL/min 时为 40.7%,10mL/min 时为 40.8%,20mL/min 时为 73.1%,30mL/min 时为 102.3%,40mL/min 时为 99.0%,50mL/min 时为 98.0%。当以 40 至 50mL/min 的盐输注进行比较时,存在显著的流量高估偏差(Bland-Altman:偏差±SD,-73.09±30.52;95%一致性区间,-132.9 至-13.27)。在更高的输注率下,偶尔会因缺血变化导致心室颤动(50mL/min 时为 9.5%)。

结论

30mL/min 但不是 20mL/min 的连续盐水输注可诱导最大充血。以 40 至 50mL/min 的盐水输注速度测量的绝对冠状动脉血流既不准确也不安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验