Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2024 Jun;34(4):e2976. doi: 10.1002/eap.2976. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
Biomass allocation in plants is the foundation for understanding dynamics in ecosystem carbon balance, species competition, and plant-environment interactions. However, existing work on plant allometry has mainly focused on trees, with fewer studies having developed allometric equations for grasses. Grasses with different life histories can vary in their carbon investment by prioritizing the growth of specific organs to survive, outcompete co-occurring plants, and ensure population persistence. Further, because grasses are important fuels for wildfire, the lack of grass allocation data adds uncertainty to process-based models that relate plant physiology to wildfire dynamics. To fill this gap, we conducted a greenhouse experiment with 11 common California grasses varying in photosynthetic pathway and growth form. We measured plant sizes and harvested above- and belowground biomass throughout the life cycle of annual species, while for the establishment stage of perennial grasses to quantify allometric relationships for leaf, stem, and root biomass, as well as plant height and canopy area. We used basal diameter as a reference measure of plant size. Overall, basal diameter is the best predictor for leaf and stem biomass, height, and canopy area. Including height as another predictor can improve model accuracy in predicting leaf and stem biomass and canopy area. Fine root biomass is a function of leaf biomass alone. Species vary in their allometric relationships, with most variation occurring for plant height, canopy area, and stem biomass. We further explored potential trade-offs in biomass allocation across species between leaf and fine root, leaf and stem, and allocation to reproduction. Consistent with our expectation, we found that fast-growing plants allocated a greater fraction to reproduction. Additionally, plant height and specific leaf area negatively influenced the leaf-to-stem ratio. However, contrary to our hypothesis, there were no differences in root-to-leaf ratio between perennial and annual or C and C plants. Our study provides species-specific and functional-type-specific allometry equations for both above- and belowground organs of 11 common California grass species, enabling nondestructive biomass assessment in California grasslands. These allometric relationships and trade-offs in carbon allocation across species can improve ecosystem model predictions of grassland species interactions and environmental responses through differences in morphology.
植物生物量分配是理解生态系统碳平衡、物种竞争和植物-环境相互作用动态的基础。然而,现有的植物生长分析主要集中在树木上,而对草本植物的生长分析方程研究较少。具有不同生活史的草本植物可以通过优先生长特定器官来生存、与共存植物竞争以及确保种群持续生存,从而在碳投资方面有所不同。此外,由于草本植物是野火的重要燃料,缺乏草本植物分配数据会增加将植物生理学与野火动态相关联的基于过程的模型的不确定性。为了填补这一空白,我们在加利福尼亚州的 11 种常见草本植物中进行了一项温室实验,这些植物在光合作用途径和生长形式上有所不同。我们在整个生命周期中测量了植物的大小,并收获了一年生植物的地上和地下生物量,而对于多年生草本植物的建立阶段,我们则量化了叶、茎和根生物量以及植物高度和冠层面积的生长分析关系。我们使用基径作为植物大小的参考测量值。总的来说,基径是叶和茎生物量、高度和冠层面积的最佳预测因子。包含高度作为另一个预测因子可以提高预测叶和茎生物量和冠层面积的模型准确性。细根生物量是叶生物量的函数。物种的生长分析关系存在差异,大多数变化发生在植物高度、冠层面积和茎生物量上。我们进一步探讨了物种之间叶和细根、叶和茎以及分配给繁殖的生物量分配的潜在权衡。与我们的预期一致,我们发现生长速度较快的植物分配更多的比例用于繁殖。此外,植物高度和比叶面积负影响叶茎比。然而,与我们的假设相反,多年生和一年生或 C 和 C 植物之间的根叶比没有差异。我们的研究为加利福尼亚州的 11 种常见草本植物的地上和地下器官提供了物种特异性和功能类型特异性的生长分析关系方程,使加利福尼亚草原的非破坏性生物量评估成为可能。这些跨物种的碳分配关系和权衡可以通过形态差异提高生态系统模型对草原物种相互作用和环境响应的预测。