Suppr超能文献

分娩前细菌性阴道病的筛查:一项成本效益研究。

Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis Prior to Delivery: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

作者信息

Knochenhauer Hope E, Lim Stephanie L, Havrilesky Laura J, Dotters-Katz Sarah K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecolgy, Staten Island University, Northwell Health, Staten Island, New York.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;42(1):25-33. doi: 10.1055/a-2316-8955. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the cost and effectiveness of three strategies for screening and/or treating bacterial vaginosis (BV) during pregnancy prior to delivery: (1) the current standard of care was neither test nor treat for BV (Treat None); (2) test all patients for BV at 36 weeks' gestation; treat if positive (Test Treat); and (3) treat all patients undergoing cesarean delivery with intravenous metronidazole at time of surgery (Treat All Cesarean). Effectiveness was defined as avoidance of postpartum surgical site infection (SSI).

STUDY DESIGN

A decision analytic cost-effectiveness model was designed from a third-party payer perspective using clinical and cost estimates obtained from the literature, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use file (2005-2019), 2019 National Vital Statistics, Medicare costs, and wholesale drug costs. Cost estimates were inflated to 2020 U.S. dollars. For this study, effectiveness was defined as avoidance of postpartum SSIs.

RESULTS

The base case analysis that is the current standard of care of not routinely testing and treating patients for BV (Treat None) was the most expensive and least effective strategy, with a mean cost of $59.16 and infection rate of 3.71%. Empirically treating all patients for BV without testing (Treat All Cesarean) was the most effective and the least expensive strategy, with a mean cost of $53.50 and an infection rate of 2.75%. Testing all patients for BV and treating those positive for BV (Test Treat) was also relatively inexpensive and effective, with an infection rate of 2.94% and mean cost of $57.05. Compared with Treat None, we would expect the Treat All Cesarean strategy to reduce the infection rate by 26%.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that treating pregnant patients with intravenous metronidazole at time of cesarean delivery could be an effective and cost-saving strategy. Testing and treating for BV could also be considered a reasonable strategy, as it has the added benefit of preserving antibiotic stewardship. In no analysis was the standard of care strategy of neither testing nor treating for BV before delivery the preferred strategy.

KEY POINTS

· BV colonization may increase surgical site infection risk after cesarean section.. · Treatment of BV before or during delivery may be cost-saving strategies as treatment could prevent costs associated with infection.. · Further study is needed to best balance the risk of surgical site infection with antibiotic stewardship..

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较三种在分娩前筛查和/或治疗妊娠期细菌性阴道病(BV)的策略的成本和效果:(1)当前的护理标准是既不检测也不治疗BV(均不治疗);(2)在妊娠36周时对所有患者进行BV检测;阳性则治疗(检测并治疗);(3)对所有接受剖宫产的患者在手术时静脉注射甲硝唑进行治疗(所有剖宫产患者均治疗)。效果定义为避免产后手术部位感染(SSI)。

研究设计

从第三方支付方的角度设计了一个决策分析成本效益模型,使用从文献、美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划参与者使用文件(2005 - 2019年)、2019年国家生命统计数据、医疗保险成本和药品批发成本中获得的临床和成本估计。成本估计按2020年美元进行了通胀调整。在本研究中,效果定义为避免产后SSI。

结果

基础病例分析即当前不常规检测和治疗患者BV的护理标准(均不治疗)是最昂贵且效果最差策略,平均成本为59.16美元,感染率为3.71%。对所有患者不检测而经验性治疗BV(所有剖宫产患者均治疗)是最有效且成本最低的策略,平均成本为53.50美元,感染率为2.75%。对所有患者进行BV检测并治疗阳性患者(检测并治疗)也相对便宜且有效,感染率为2.94%,平均成本为57.05美元。与均不治疗相比,我们预计所有剖宫产患者均治疗策略可使感染率降低26%。

结论

这些发现表明,在剖宫产时用静脉注射甲硝唑治疗孕妇可能是一种有效且节省成本的策略。检测和治疗BV也可被视为一种合理策略,因为它具有维护抗生素管理的额外益处。在任何分析中,分娩前既不检测也不治疗BV的护理标准策略都不是首选策略。

关键点

·BV定植可能增加剖宫产后手术部位感染风险。·在分娩前或期间治疗BV可能是节省成本的策略,因为治疗可预防与感染相关的成本。·需要进一步研究以最佳平衡手术部位感染风险与抗生素管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验