Giordano Cristiana, Rosellini Elisabetta, Cascone Maria Grazia, Di Puccio Francesca
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 23;10(7):e28711. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28711. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
Abdominal hernia repair surgeries involve the fixation of a surgical mesh to the abdominal wall with different means such as suture, tacks, and glues. Currently, the most effective mesh fixation system is still debated. This review compares outcomes of mesh fixation in different surgical procedures, aiding surgeons in identifying the optimal technique.
A meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 2003 and January 2023 were searched in electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mesh fixation with cyanoacrylate-based or fibrin glues with classical fixation techniques (sutures, tacks) in open and laparoscopic procedures were included.
17 RCTs were identified; the cumulative study population included 3919 patients and a total of 3976 inguinal hernias. Cyanoacrylate-based and fibrin glues were used in 1639 different defects, suture and tacks in 1912 defects, self-gripping mesh in 404 cases, and no mesh fixation in 21 defects. Glue fixation resulted in lower early postoperative pain, and chronic pain occurred less frequently. The incidence of hematoma was lower with glue fixation than with mechanical fixation. Recurrence rate, seroma formation, operative and hospitalization time showed no significant differences; but significantly, a higher number of people in the glue group returned to work by 15- and 30-days after surgery when compared to the tacker and suture groups in the same time frame.
Cyanoacrylate and fibrin glue may be effective in reducing early and chronic pain and hematoma incidence without increasing the recurrence rate, the seroma formation, or the operative and hospitalization time.
腹部疝修补手术涉及通过缝合、钉合和胶水等不同方式将手术补片固定于腹壁。目前,最有效的补片固定系统仍存在争议。本综述比较了不同手术操作中补片固定的效果,以帮助外科医生确定最佳技术。
根据PRISMA指南进行荟萃分析。在电子数据库中检索2003年1月至2023年1月发表的文章。纳入在开放手术和腹腔镜手术中比较基于氰基丙烯酸酯或纤维蛋白胶水的补片固定与传统固定技术(缝合、钉合)的随机对照试验(RCT)。
共纳入17项RCT;累计研究人群包括3919例患者和总共3976例腹股沟疝。基于氰基丙烯酸酯和纤维蛋白胶水用于1639个不同缺损,缝合和钉合用于1912个缺损,自固定补片用于404例,21个缺损未进行补片固定。胶水固定导致术后早期疼痛较轻,慢性疼痛发生率较低。胶水固定的血肿发生率低于机械固定。复发率、血清肿形成、手术时间和住院时间无显著差异;但值得注意的是,与同一时间框架内的钉合组和缝合组相比,胶水组在术后15天和30天时恢复工作的人数更多。
氰基丙烯酸酯和纤维蛋白胶水可能在不增加复发率、血清肿形成、手术时间和住院时间的情况下有效减轻早期和慢性疼痛以及血肿发生率。