Suppr超能文献

颅底脊索瘤的负担:来自观察性研究荟萃分析的见解。

The burden of skull base chordomas: insights from a meta-analysis of observational studies.

机构信息

1Unit of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

2Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2024 May;56(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2024.3.FOCUS23922.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative synthesis of the survival outcomes for patients with skull base chordomas, focusing on the role of 1) the extent of resection (gross-total [GTR] vs non-GTR), 2) the type of surgery (primary vs revision), 3) tumor histology, and 4) the different use of adjuvant therapies (proton beam radiotherapy [PBRT], photon radiotherapy [RT], or none).

METHODS

A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies describing adult and pediatric patient cohorts harboring skull base chordomas were included. The primary outcome measures were represented by the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The main intervention effects were represented by the extent of resection (GTR vs non-GTR), type of surgical excision (primary vs revision surgeries), tumor histology, and the different use of adjuvant therapies (PBRT, RT, or none). The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for case series.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-four studies were identified through a database and register search. After study selection, 51 studies and 3871 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year OS rate was 73%, which increased to 84% among patients undergoing GTR. The overall 5-year PFS rate was 52%, increasing to 74% for patients receiving GTR. The 5-year OS and PFS rates for patients undergoing PBRT were 86% and 71%, compared with 71% and 54% for patients receiving RT, and 55% and 25% when no adjuvant treatments were used. Patients undergoing their first surgery had 2.13-fold greater chances of being disease-free and 1.4-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years follow-up compared with patients who received a revision surgery. Patients harboring chondroid chordomas had 1.13- and 1.9-fold greater chances of being alive at 5 years compared with patients with conventional and de-differentiated chordomas, respectively. The overall risk of bias was low in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this comprehensive meta-analysis highlight the tremendous impact of GTR and adjuvant PBRT on improving OS and PFS of patients harboring skull base chordomas, with better survival rates demonstrated for patients with chondroid tumors. Even in experienced hands, the rate of surgical morbidity remains high. Proper management in high-volume centers is mandatory to reach the expected resection goal at the first surgical attempt and to reduce surgical morbidity. The introduction of the endoscopic endonasal approach was related to improved surgical and functional outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对颅底脊索瘤患者的生存结果进行定量综合分析,重点关注以下四个方面:1)切除范围(大体全切除[GTR]与非 GTR);2)手术类型(初次手术与再次手术);3)肿瘤组织学;4)辅助治疗的不同应用(质子束放疗[PBRT]、光子放疗[RT]或无辅助治疗)。

方法

本研究遵循 2020 年 PRISMA 指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。纳入描述颅底脊索瘤的成人和儿科患者队列的观察性研究。主要结局指标为 5 年总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)。主要干预措施包括切除范围(GTR 与非 GTR)、手术切除类型(初次手术与再次手术)、肿瘤组织学和辅助治疗的不同应用(PBRT、RT 或无辅助治疗)。使用随机森林模型计算汇总估计值。采用 Joanna Briggs 研究所病例系列检查表评估偏倚风险。

结果

通过数据库和登记处搜索,共确定了 644 项研究。经过研究选择,51 项研究和 3871 名患者纳入荟萃分析。总的 5 年 OS 率为 73%,GTR 组患者的 OS 率增至 84%。总的 5 年 PFS 率为 52%,GTR 组患者的 PFS 率增至 74%。接受 PBRT 治疗的患者 5 年 OS 和 PFS 率分别为 86%和 71%,接受 RT 治疗的患者分别为 71%和 54%,未接受辅助治疗的患者分别为 55%和 25%。初次手术的患者无疾病生存率增加 2.13 倍,5 年生存率增加 1.4 倍,而再次手术的患者无疾病生存率降低 1.4 倍,5 年生存率降低 1.4 倍。与常规和去分化脊索瘤患者相比,软骨样脊索瘤患者 5 年生存率分别增加 1.13 倍和 1.9 倍。纳入研究的整体偏倚风险较低。

结论

本全面荟萃分析的结果强调了 GTR 和辅助 PBRT 对改善颅底脊索瘤患者 OS 和 PFS 的巨大影响,软骨样肿瘤患者的生存率更高。即使在经验丰富的医生手中,手术发病率仍然很高。在高容量中心进行适当的管理对于在初次手术时达到预期的切除目标并降低手术发病率至关重要。内镜经鼻入路的引入与手术和功能结局的改善有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验