Suppr超能文献

度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌(TOPAZ-1):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照3期试验的患者报告结局

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Burris Howard A, Okusaka Takuji, Vogel Arndt, Lee Myung Ah, Takahashi Hidenori, Breder Valeriy, Blanc Jean-Frédéric, Li Junhe, Bachini Melinda, Żotkiewicz Magdalena, Abraham Jayne, Patel Nikunj, Wang Julie, Ali Muzammil, Rokutanda Nana, Cohen Gordon, Oh Do-Youn

机构信息

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2024 May;25(5):626-635. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00082-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1.

METHODS

In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m gemcitabine and 25 mg/m cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

摘要

背景

在正在进行的随机、双盲3期TOPAZ-1研究中,在预先计划的期中分析中,与安慰剂、吉西他滨和顺铂相比,程序性死亡受体1配体(PD-L1)抑制剂度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂可显著改善晚期胆管癌患者的总生存期。在本文中,我们展示了TOPAZ-1研究中患者报告的结局。

方法

在TOPAZ-1研究(NCT03875235)中,年龄在18岁及以上、先前未经治疗、无法切除、局部晚期或转移性胆管癌、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1且根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST;1.1版)有一个或多个可测量病灶的参与者,使用计算机生成的随机方案随机分配(1:1)至度伐利尤单抗组或安慰剂组。参与者每3周(在周期的第1天)静脉注射1500 mg度伐利尤单抗或匹配的安慰剂,最多8个周期,同时每3周的第1天和第8天静脉注射1000 mg/m²吉西他滨和25 mg/m²顺铂,最多8个周期。此后,参与者每4周接受一次度伐利尤单抗(1500 mg)或安慰剂单药静脉注射,直至疾病进展或满足其他停药标准。随机分组按疾病状态(初始无法切除与复发)和原发肿瘤部位(肝内胆管癌与肝外胆管癌与胆囊癌)进行分层。在所有完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的30项癌症患者生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)和21项胆管癌和胆囊癌生活质量模块(QLQ-BIL21)的参与者中,将患者报告的结局作为次要结局进行评估。我们计算了恶化时间,即从随机分组到患者报告结局中至少下降10分且在随后一次就诊时得到确认的时间,或在无恶化情况下的死亡日期(任何原因),并计算了患者报告结局相对于基线的调整后平均变化。

结果

在2019年4月16日至2020年12月11日期间,685名参与者入组并随机分组,341名分配至度伐利尤单抗组,344名分配至安慰剂组。总体而言,345名(50%)参与者为男性,340名(50%)为女性。度伐利尤单抗组318名参与者和安慰剂组328名参与者有QLQ-C30数据(中位随访9.9个月[四分位间距6.7至14.1])。度伐利尤单抗组305名参与者和安慰剂组322名参与者有QLQ-BIL21数据(中位随访10.2个月[四分位间距6.7至14.3])。两组中完成问卷的参与者比例都很高,且各治疗组的基线分数大多相似。对于总体健康状况或生活质量、功能和症状,我们发现两组之间在恶化时间或相对于基线的调整后平均变化方面没有差异。度伐利尤单抗组总体健康状况或生活质量的中位恶化时间为7.4个月(95%CI 5.6至8.9),安慰剂组为6.7个月(5.6至7.9)(风险比0.87[95%CI 0.69至1.12])。度伐利尤单抗组相对于基线的调整后平均变化为1.23(95%CI -0.71至3.16),安慰剂组为0.35(-1.63至2.32)。

解读

在吉西他滨和顺铂基础上加用度伐利尤单抗对患者报告的结局没有不利影响。这些结果表明,度伐利尤单抗、吉西他滨和顺铂是晚期胆管癌患者可耐受的治疗方案。

资助

阿斯利康公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验