Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island (all authors)..
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island (all authors).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Jul;31(7):607-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.020. Epub 2024 May 1.
To compare demographic characteristics of women with and without a diagnosis of endometriosis.
Data were collected from the National Survey of Family Growth-a publicly available survey designed and administered by the Centers for Disease Control, which uses a nationally-representative sample of the United States population. Univariate data were reported as survey-weighted percentages and means and were analyzed using chi-square, t tests, and logistic regression. Analyses accounted for complex survey design.
United States.
Interviews were conducted with 6141 female respondents, aged 15 to 50, between 2017 and 2019.
Data were collected through in-person interviews.
Nationally, 5.7% reported a diagnosis of endometriosis (95% CI 4.6-6.9%). Those with endometriosis were older, with a mean age of 39 (95% CI 38.1-39.9), compared to 31.7 (95% CI 31.2-32.2) among those without (p <.0005). Endometriosis diagnosis was significantly associated with race. Compared to non-Hispanic White women, Hispanic women had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.37 (95% CI 0.21-0.65) for diagnosis of endometriosis, and non-Hispanic Black women had an aOR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.35-0.84). We also observed a difference in diagnosis by health insurance: compared to those with private insurance or Medi-Gap coverage, those with Medicare or military insurance had an aOR for endometriosis diagnosis of 2.49 (95% CI 1.36-4.55). Finally, compared to those with less than a high school education, those who had completed high school or greater had an aOR for endometriosis diagnosis of 2.84 (95% CI 1.15-6.99).
These disparities in endometriosis diagnosis suggest that intersecting barriers may preclude certain groups from accessing timely endometriosis diagnosis and management. Further studies are warranted to explore these hypothesis-generating data and to identify and address specific barriers to equitable endometriosis diagnosis and management.
比较诊断为子宫内膜异位症和未诊断为子宫内膜异位症的女性的人口统计学特征。
数据来自国家生育调查-由疾病控制中心设计和管理的公开调查,该调查使用了美国人口的全国代表性样本。单变量数据以调查加权百分比和平均值报告,并使用卡方检验、t 检验和逻辑回归进行分析。分析考虑了复杂的调查设计。
美国。
2017 年至 2019 年间,对 6141 名年龄在 15 至 50 岁的女性受访者进行了访谈。
通过面对面访谈收集数据。
全国范围内,5.7%的人报告诊断为子宫内膜异位症(95%置信区间 4.6-6.9%)。与没有子宫内膜异位症的女性(31.7%,95%置信区间 31.2-32.2%)相比,患有子宫内膜异位症的女性年龄更大,平均年龄为 39 岁(95%置信区间 38.1-39.9%)(p<0.0005)。子宫内膜异位症的诊断与种族显著相关。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,西班牙裔女性患子宫内膜异位症的调整优势比(aOR)为 0.37(95%置信区间 0.21-0.65),非西班牙裔黑人女性为 0.54(95%置信区间 0.35-0.84)。我们还观察到医疗保险诊断差异:与拥有私人保险或 Medi-Gap 保险的人相比,拥有医疗保险或军人保险的人诊断为子宫内膜异位症的调整优势比为 2.49(95%置信区间 1.36-4.55)。最后,与受教育程度低于高中的人相比,完成高中学业或更高学历的人诊断为子宫内膜异位症的调整优势比为 2.84(95%置信区间 1.15-6.99)。
这些子宫内膜异位症诊断方面的差异表明,交叉障碍可能使某些群体无法及时获得子宫内膜异位症的诊断和治疗。需要进一步研究来探索这些产生假设的数据,并确定和解决公平诊断和管理子宫内膜异位症的具体障碍。