Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany.
J Mol Diagn. 2024 Jul;26(7):624-637. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.
在精准肿瘤学中,可靠的预测性分子生物标志物检测是优化患者治疗的前提。实验室间的比较是验证诊断性能和方法再现性的重要工具。本文描述了由德国病理学质量有限公司组织的首次反复进行的、国际上进行的 PIK3CA(磷脂酰肌醇-4,5-二磷酸 3 激酶催化亚单位 α)乳腺癌组织外部质量评估(EQA)的设计和结果,该评估于 2021 年开始。在(牵头)小组研究所进行内部预测试阶段之后,2021 年和 2022 年,每个 EQA 测试集都包含 n = 10 个激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性浸润性乳腺癌的组织样本,参与者必须对其进行分析和报告。2021 年,德国讲德语国家(第 1 部分)和国际实验室(第 2 部分)分别对结果进行了评估。2022 年,在欧盟范围内进行了 EQA。2021 年第 1 部分、第 2 部分和 2022 年 EQA 的 EQA 成功率分别为 84.6%(n = 11/13)、88.6%(n = 39/44)和 87.9%(n = 29/33)。最常用的方法是下一代测序和基于突变/等位基因特异性定性 PCR 的检测方法。总之,这种反复进行的 PIK3CA EQA 被证明是一种获取用于 PIK3CA 突变分析的方法的国际概述、定性评估它们并识别个别方法的优缺点的合适方法。