Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-1153.
Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Am J Disaster Med. 2024;19(2):131-137. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.0477.
We hypothesized that medical students would be empowered by hemorrhage-control training and would support efforts to include Stop the Bleed® (STB) in medical education.
This is a multi-institution survey study. Surveys were administered immediately following and 6 months after the course.
This study took place at the Association of American Medical Colleges-accredited medical schools in the United States.
Participants were first-year medical students at participating institutions. A total of 442 students completed post-course surveys, and 213 students (48.2 percent) also completed 6-month follow-up surveys.
An 1-hour, in-person STB course.
Student empowerment was measured by Likert-scale scoring, 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The usage of hemorrhage-control skills was also measured.
A total of 419 students (95.9 percent) affirmed that the course taught the basics of bleeding control, and 169 (79.3 percent) responded positively at follow-up, with a significant decrease in Likert response (4.65, 3.87, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-three students (97.0 percent) affirmed that they would apply bleeding control skills to a patient, and 192 (90.1 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.61, 4.19, p < 0.001). Three hundred and sixty-one students (82.8 percent) believed that they were able to save a life, and 109 (51.2 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.14, 3.56, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-five students (97.0 percent) would recommend the course to another medical student, and 196 (92.0 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.68, 4.31, p < 0.001). Six students (2.8 percent) used skills on live patients, with success in five of the six instances.
Medical students were empowered by STB and have used hemorrhage-control skills on live victims. Medical students support efforts to include STB in medical education.
我们假设医学生通过出血控制培训能够获得更多的自主权,并支持将“停止出血”(STB)纳入医学教育的努力。
这是一项多机构调查研究。调查在课程结束后立即和 6 个月后进行。
本研究在美国的美国医学协会认可的医学院进行。
参与者为参加机构的一年级医学生。共有 442 名学生完成了课后调查,其中 213 名学生(48.2%)还完成了 6 个月的随访调查。
1 小时的现场 STB 课程。
学生的自主权通过李克特量表评分来衡量,范围为 1(强烈不同意)到 5(强烈同意)。还测量了出血控制技能的使用情况。
共有 419 名学生(95.9%)肯定该课程教授了出血控制的基础知识,169 名学生(79.3%)在随访时做出了积极的回应,李克特反应明显下降(4.65,3.87,p<0.001)。423 名学生(97.0%)肯定会将出血控制技能应用于患者,192 名学生(90.1%)在随访时做出了积极的回应(4.61,4.19,p<0.001)。361 名学生(82.8%)认为他们能够挽救生命,109 名学生(51.2%)在随访时做出了积极的回应(4.14,3.56,p<0.001)。425 名学生(97.0%)会向其他医学生推荐该课程,196 名学生(92.0%)在随访时做出了积极的回应(4.68,4.31,p<0.001)。6 名学生(2.8%)在活体患者身上使用了这些技能,其中 5 例成功。
STB 赋予医学生权力,他们在活体患者身上使用了出血控制技能。医学生支持将 STB 纳入医学教育的努力。