Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, VBIC, INSERM U1047, Univ Montpellier, Platform MICRO&BIO, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 May 3;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00698-z.
Non-surgical chronic wounds, including diabetes-related foot diseases (DRFD), pressure injuries (PIs) and venous leg ulcers (VLU), are common hard-to-heal wounds. Wound evolution partly depends on microbial colonisation or infection, which is often confused by clinicians, thereby hampering proper management. Current routine microbiology investigation of these wounds is based on in vitro culture, focusing only on a limited panel of the most frequently isolated bacteria, leaving a large part of the wound microbiome undocumented.
A literature search was conducted on original studies published through October 2022 reporting metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) of chronic wound samples. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they applied 16 S rRNA metagenomics or shotgun metagenomics for microbiome analysis or diagnosis. Case reports, prospective, or retrospective studies were included. However, review articles, animal studies, in vitro model optimisation, benchmarking, treatment optimisation studies, and non-clinical studies were excluded. Articles were identified in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Microsoft Academic, Crossref and Semantic Scholar databases.
Of the 3,202 articles found in the initial search, 2,336 articles were removed after deduplication and 834 articles following title and abstract screening. A further 14 were removed after full text reading, with 18 articles finally included. Data were provided for 3,628 patients, including 1,535 DRFDs, 956 VLUs, and 791 PIs, with 164 microbial genera and 116 species identified using mNGS approaches. A high microbial diversity was observed depending on the geographical location and wound evolution. Clinically infected wounds were the most diverse, possibly due to a widespread colonisation by pathogenic bacteria from body and environmental microbiota. mNGS data identified the presence of virus (EBV) and fungi (Candida and Aspergillus species), as well as Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas bacteriophages.
This study highlighted the benefit of mNGS for time-effective pathogen genome detection. Despite the majority of the included studies investigating only 16 S rDNA, ignoring a part of viral, fungal and parasite colonisation, mNGS detected a large number of bacteria through the included studies. Such technology could be implemented in routine microbiology for hard-to-heal wound microbiota investigation and post-treatment wound colonisation surveillance.
非手术性慢性伤口,包括糖尿病相关足部疾病(DRFD)、压力性损伤(PI)和静脉性腿部溃疡(VLU),是常见的难以愈合的伤口。伤口的演变在一定程度上取决于微生物定植或感染,这常常被临床医生混淆,从而阻碍了适当的管理。目前对这些伤口的常规微生物学检查是基于体外培养的,仅关注最常分离的细菌的有限一组,而大部分伤口微生物组则未被记录。
对截至 2022 年 10 月发表的原始研究进行了文献检索,这些研究报告了对慢性伤口样本进行的宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)。如果研究应用 16S rRNA 宏基因组学或鸟枪法宏基因组学进行微生物组分析或诊断,则符合纳入标准。纳入病例报告、前瞻性或回顾性研究。然而,排除了综述文章、动物研究、体外模型优化、基准测试、治疗优化研究和非临床研究。文章在 PubMed、Google Scholar、Web of Science、Microsoft Academic、Crossref 和 Semantic Scholar 数据库中被发现。
在最初的搜索中发现的 3202 篇文章中,经过去重后有 2336 篇文章被删除,标题和摘要筛选后有 834 篇文章被删除。进一步有 14 篇文章在全文阅读后被删除,最终有 18 篇文章被纳入。共提供了 3628 名患者的数据,包括 1535 例 DRFD、956 例 VLU 和 791 例 PI,使用 mNGS 方法鉴定了 164 种微生物属和 116 种微生物种。根据地理位置和伤口演变情况,观察到微生物多样性很高。临床上感染的伤口多样性最高,这可能是由于身体和环境微生物群中的致病性细菌广泛定植所致。mNGS 数据鉴定出了病毒(EBV)和真菌(念珠菌和曲霉属)以及葡萄球菌和假单胞菌噬菌体的存在。
本研究强调了 mNGS 用于有效检测病原体基因组的优势。尽管大多数纳入的研究仅调查了 16S rDNA,忽略了部分病毒、真菌和寄生虫定植,但 mNGS 通过纳入的研究检测到了大量细菌。该技术可用于常规微生物学,以调查难以愈合的伤口微生物群,并监测治疗后伤口的定植情况。