Hidaka Ryo, Matsuda Kenta, Nakamura Shigeru, Nakamura Masaki, Kawano Hirotaka
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nishitokyo Chuo General Hospital, 2-4-19, Shibakubo-Cho, Nishitokyo, Tokyo, 188-0014, Japan.
Arthroplasty. 2024 May 5;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00245-3.
Implant impingement and soft tissue tension are factors involved in dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Combined anteversion (CA) has been used as an indicator for implant placement. However, optimal implant placement remains a challenge. Moreover, the effect of changes in offset on dislocation is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to clarify the effects of postoperative CA and pre- and postoperative changes in offset on dislocation.
Included were patients who underwent primary cementless THA between 2013 and 2020. The mean values of CA and offset in the dislocation and non-dislocation groups were compared. The CA values within ± 10% of the recommended values were defined as good CA, and those outside the range were rated as poor CA. The dislocation rates were compared between the good and poor CA groups and between the groups with and without increased offset.
A total of 283 hips were included. The mean values of CA in the dislocation and non-dislocation groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). The dislocation rate was significantly lower in the good CA group (P < 0.05). The dislocation rates in the groups with and without increased total offset were 0.5% and 4.3%, respectively (P = 0.004). There were no dislocations in patients with good CA and increased offset.
The dislocation rate was significantly lower when implants were placed within ± 10% of the recommended CA value. Our results suggest that dislocation can be avoided by placing the implant in the good CA range and considering the increase in total offset on the operative side.
植入物撞击和软组织张力是全髋关节置换术(THA)后脱位的相关因素。联合前倾角(CA)已被用作植入物放置的指标。然而,最佳的植入物放置仍然是一个挑战。此外,偏心距变化对脱位的影响仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在阐明术后CA以及术前和术后偏心距变化对脱位的影响。
纳入2013年至2020年间接受初次非骨水泥型THA的患者。比较脱位组和非脱位组CA和偏心距的平均值。将CA值在推荐值±10%范围内定义为良好CA,超出该范围的则评为不良CA。比较良好CA组和不良CA组之间以及偏心距增加和未增加组之间的脱位率。
共纳入283髋。脱位组和非脱位组的CA平均值有显著差异(P<0.05)。良好CA组的脱位率显著更低(P<0.05)。总偏心距增加组和未增加组的脱位率分别为0.5%和4.3%(P=0.004)。CA良好且偏心距增加的患者未发生脱位。
当植入物放置在推荐CA值的±10%范围内时,脱位率显著更低。我们的结果表明,通过将植入物放置在良好CA范围内并考虑手术侧总偏心距的增加,可以避免脱位。