Tapia-Rojas Salyoc, García-Paitán Marlon, Rosario-Chavarri Jorge Del, Santiani Alexei, Alvarez-Vega Santiago, Amiel-Pérez José, Mayanga-Herrera Ana
Cell Culture and Immunology Lab, Universidad Científica del Sur, Antigua Panamericana Sur km 19, Lima, 15067, Perú.
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, German Amezaga Av., Lima, 15080, Perú.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;31(6):104000. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.104000. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
Fluorescence is used in various biological assays due to its high sensitivity, versatility, and precision. In recent years, studies using medicinal plant extracts have increased. However, fluorescence-based assays could be biased by plant metabolites autofluorescence. To address this issue, this study investigated the interference caused by methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of three medicinal plants in three fluorescence-based assays on gastric cancer stem cells(CSC): resazurin reduction, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry. CSC were isolated based on CD44 surface marker, incubated with methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions of . Resazurin assay evidenced that CSC exposed to extracts and fractions from the three plants showed significant differences in relative fluorescence units (RFU) levels (p < 0.001) compared to the unexposed groups after a 3-hour incubation. In addition, DMSO-treated CSC exposed to extracts and fractions had significantly lower fluorescence levels than living ones, but higher than extracts and fractions without cells. In confocal microscopy, cancer stem cells exposed to extracts and fractions of and were observed in the same emission spectra of the CSC markers. In flow cytometry, CSC exposed to extracts and fractions without any fluorescent dyes were detected in the double positive quadrants for CSC markers (CD44+/CD133 + ). Among the three plants exhibited the least interference. These results show that methanolic extracts and chloroform fractions contain autofluorescent metabolites that interfere with fluorescence-based assays. These results highlight the importance of a prior evaluation for possible fluorescence interference to avoid interpretation biases in fluorescence assays.
由于具有高灵敏度、多功能性和精确性,荧光被用于各种生物学检测中。近年来,使用药用植物提取物的研究有所增加。然而,基于荧光的检测可能会受到植物代谢物自发荧光的影响。为了解决这个问题,本研究调查了三种药用植物的甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分在三种基于荧光的胃癌干细胞(CSC)检测中的干扰情况:刃天青还原、共聚焦显微镜和流式细胞术。基于CD44表面标志物分离CSC,并与甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分一起孵育。刃天青检测表明,与未暴露组相比,暴露于三种植物提取物和馏分的CSC在孵育3小时后相对荧光单位(RFU)水平存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。此外,用二甲基亚砜(DMSO)处理并暴露于提取物和馏分的CSC的荧光水平明显低于活细胞,但高于不含细胞的提取物和馏分。在共聚焦显微镜下,观察到暴露于提取物和馏分的癌干细胞在CSC标志物的相同发射光谱中。在流式细胞术中,在CSC标志物(CD44+/CD133 +)的双阳性象限中检测到暴露于无任何荧光染料的提取物和馏分的CSC。在这三种植物中,[此处原文缺失一种植物名称]表现出的干扰最小。这些结果表明,甲醇提取物和氯仿馏分含有自发荧光代谢物,会干扰基于荧光的检测。这些结果强调了事先评估可能的荧光干扰对于避免荧光检测中解释偏差的重要性。