Nakagawa Kyuya, Chantanuson Ratchanon, Boonarsa Parinya, Seephua Nidthaya, Siriamornpun Sirithon
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan.
Research Unit of Thai Food Innovation (TFI), Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand.
Food Chem X. 2024 Apr 20;22:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101402. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
The rising demand for sustainable protein sources has encouraged interest in alternative food products like meat analogues. This study explores formulating meat analogues using cricket powder (CP) and rice flours, comparing them with soy protein-based analogues. CP exhibited a higher soluble protein content (5.9%) than soy protein powder (4.7%), enhancing textural properties by forming fiber-like structures, increasing firmness and adhesion, and reducing chewiness. Despite having a lower water holding capacity (WHC) than soy analogues, all samples outperformed chicken breast WHC. Under freezing conditions, CP and rice flour combinations formed multilayered structures in protein gels. The optimal formulations were CP and sticky rice flour (ratio 6:1) with respect to their texture properties, fiber structure, and nutritional value. This study highlights the potential of cricket powder and rice flour combinations as viable meat analogue ingredients, addressing the need for sustainable protein sources in the food industry.
对可持续蛋白质来源的需求不断增加,激发了人们对肉类替代品等替代食品的兴趣。本研究探索了使用蟋蟀粉(CP)和米粉来制作肉类替代品,并将其与大豆蛋白基替代品进行比较。CP的可溶性蛋白含量(5.9%)高于大豆蛋白粉(4.7%),通过形成纤维状结构提高了质地特性,增加了硬度和粘附性,并降低了咀嚼性。尽管CP的持水能力(WHC)低于大豆替代品,但所有样品的WHC均优于鸡胸肉。在冷冻条件下,CP和米粉组合在蛋白质凝胶中形成了多层结构。就质地特性、纤维结构和营养价值而言,最佳配方是CP和糯米粉(比例为6:1)。本研究强调了蟋蟀粉和米粉组合作为可行的肉类替代品成分的潜力,满足了食品行业对可持续蛋白质来源的需求。