Sankar Anjali, Solete Pradeep, Jeevanandan Ganesh, Priscilla Antony Delphine, Arun Nishitha, Raghu Sandhya
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 8;16(4):e57805. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57805. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Introduction Non-surgical retreatment is seen as a conservative choice for dealing with recurrent infections, instead of opting for periapical surgery. The retreatment processes should be promptly and efficiently carried out, utilizing a suitable armamentarium. The objective of this experiment is to evaluate the quantity of root dentin that remains following the removal of gutta-percha (GP) from the root canal employing two distinct retreatment files. Materials and methods Sixty single-rooted teeth were selected for the examination. The process of shaping and cleaning was performed using the step-back approach, with a master apical file size of 40. The smear layer was effectively eliminated by rinsing with a solution of 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Paper points were employed to desiccate the canals. The obturation process involved the utilization of the lateral compaction technique with the AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona, NC, USA). The teeth were classified into two groups: Group I (n=30) underwent retreatment using HyFlex Remover (Coletene India, Pvt., Ltd.), whereas Group II (n=30) received therapy with Solite RS3 retreatment files (Solite Dental in Chennai, India). The remaining dentin thickness (RDT) was assessed by cone beam computed tomography at levels 3, 6, and 9 mm from the cemento enamel junction after the removal of GP. The acquired data underwent examination using an independent t-test to determine statistical significance. Results The findings demonstrate that the utilization of Solite RS3 files led to a higher level of dentin thickness remaining at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm on the mesial side in comparison to HyFlex Remover retreatment files. The observed difference was found to be statistically significant at a significance level of p<0.05 on the mesial side. Nevertheless, there was no notable disparity seen between the two file types at these three levels on the distal side (p>0.05). Conclusion Based on the obtained results of the study, it can be concluded that Solite RS3 files show promise in preserving the RDT. However, further studies encompassing diverse parameters are needed to establish a conclusive and definitive conclusion.
引言 非手术再治疗被视为处理复发性感染的保守选择,而非选择根尖手术。再治疗过程应使用合适的器械迅速且高效地进行。本实验的目的是评估使用两种不同的再治疗锉从根管中去除牙胶(GP)后剩余的牙根牙本质量。
材料与方法 选择60颗单根牙进行检查。采用逐步后退法进行根管预备和清理,主尖锉尺寸为40。用3%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸溶液冲洗有效去除玷污层。用纸尖干燥根管。根管充填采用AH Plus封闭剂(美国北卡罗来纳州登士柏西诺德公司)的侧向加压技术。将牙齿分为两组:第一组(n = 30)使用HyFlex Remover(印度科莱滕私人有限公司)进行再治疗,而第二组(n = 30)使用Solite RS3再治疗锉(印度钦奈的Solite Dental公司)进行治疗。去除牙胶后,通过锥形束计算机断层扫描在距牙骨质牙釉质界3、6和9 mm水平评估剩余牙本质厚度(RDT)。对获得的数据进行独立t检验以确定统计学意义。
结果 研究结果表明,与HyFlex Remover再治疗锉相比,使用Solite RS3锉在近中侧3 mm、6 mm和9 mm处剩余的牙本质厚度更高。在近中侧,观察到的差异在p<0.05的显著性水平上具有统计学意义。然而,在远中侧这三个水平上,两种锉之间没有明显差异(p>0.05)。
结论 根据本研究获得的结果,可以得出结论,Solite RS3锉在保留RDT方面显示出前景。然而,需要进一步涵盖不同参数的研究来得出确凿和明确的结论。