• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然语言处理增强神经外科住院患者共病文档记录。

Natural language processing augments comorbidity documentation in neurosurgical inpatient admissions.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.

Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303519. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303519
PMID:38723044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11081267/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether or not a natural language processing technique could identify two common inpatient neurosurgical comorbidities using only text reports of inpatient head imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A training and testing dataset of reports of 979 CT or MRI scans of the brain for patients admitted to the neurosurgery service of a single hospital in June 2021 or to the Emergency Department between July 1-8, 2021, was identified. A variety of machine learning and deep learning algorithms utilizing natural language processing were trained on the training set (84% of the total cohort) and tested on the remaining images. A subset comparison cohort (n = 76) was then assessed to compare output of the best algorithm against real-life inpatient documentation.

RESULTS

For "brain compression", a random forest classifier outperformed other candidate algorithms with an accuracy of 0.81 and area under the curve of 0.90 in the testing dataset. For "brain edema", a random forest classifier again outperformed other candidate algorithms with an accuracy of 0.92 and AUC of 0.94 in the testing dataset. In the provider comparison dataset, for "brain compression," the random forest algorithm demonstrated better accuracy (0.76 vs 0.70) and sensitivity (0.73 vs 0.43) than provider documentation. For "brain edema," the algorithm again demonstrated better accuracy (0.92 vs 0.84) and AUC (0.45 vs 0.09) than provider documentation.

DISCUSSION

A natural language processing-based machine learning algorithm can reliably and reproducibly identify selected common neurosurgical comorbidities from radiology reports.

CONCLUSION

This result may justify the use of machine learning-based decision support to augment provider documentation.

摘要

目的

确定自然语言处理技术是否仅通过住院头部成像的文本报告即可识别两种常见的住院神经外科合并症。

材料与方法

确定了 2021 年 6 月入住单一医院神经外科或 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 8 日入住急诊部的患者的 979 例 CT 或 MRI 脑部扫描报告的训练和测试数据集。利用自然语言处理的各种机器学习和深度学习算法在训练集(总队列的 84%)上进行了训练,并在其余图像上进行了测试。然后评估了一个子集比较队列(n=76),以比较最佳算法的输出与实际住院文档的对比。

结果

对于“脑压迫”,随机森林分类器在测试数据集中的准确率为 0.81,曲线下面积为 0.90,优于其他候选算法。对于“脑水肿”,随机森林分类器再次在测试数据集中优于其他候选算法,准确率为 0.92,曲线下面积为 0.94。在提供者比较数据集中,对于“脑压迫”,随机森林算法的准确率(0.76 对 0.70)和敏感度(0.73 对 0.43)均优于提供者文档。对于“脑水肿”,算法再次显示出优于提供者文档的准确率(0.92 对 0.84)和曲线下面积(0.45 对 0.09)。

讨论

基于自然语言处理的机器学习算法可以可靠且可重复地从放射学报告中识别出选定的常见神经外科合并症。

结论

这一结果可能证明使用基于机器学习的决策支持来增强提供者文档是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/e4d7f39979d1/pone.0303519.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/660fbfe7625d/pone.0303519.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/be670720fd74/pone.0303519.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/13db42379187/pone.0303519.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/ea06d8d1eb2c/pone.0303519.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/e4d7f39979d1/pone.0303519.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/660fbfe7625d/pone.0303519.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/be670720fd74/pone.0303519.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/13db42379187/pone.0303519.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/ea06d8d1eb2c/pone.0303519.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e8/11081267/e4d7f39979d1/pone.0303519.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Natural language processing augments comorbidity documentation in neurosurgical inpatient admissions.自然语言处理增强神经外科住院患者共病文档记录。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0303519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303519. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of an Ensemble of Machine Learning Models and the BERT Language Model for Analysis of Text Descriptions of Brain CT Reports to Determine the Presence of Intracranial Hemorrhage.基于机器学习模型集成与 BERT 语言模型的脑 CT 报告文本描述分析用于判断颅内出血的比较研究
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2024;16(1):27-34. doi: 10.17691/stm2024.16.1.03. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Natural Language Processing for Imaging Protocol Assignment: Machine Learning for Multiclass Classification of Abdominal CT Protocols Using Indication Text Data.基于自然语言处理的成像协议分配:使用指示文本数据进行多类分类的腹部 CT 协议的机器学习。
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Oct;35(5):1120-1130. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00633-8. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Prediction of Stroke Outcome Using Natural Language Processing-Based Machine Learning of Radiology Report of Brain MRI.使用基于自然语言处理的脑磁共振成像放射学报告机器学习预测卒中结局
J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 16;10(4):286. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040286.
5
Natural language processing and machine learning algorithm to identify brain MRI reports with acute ischemic stroke.自然语言处理和机器学习算法识别急性缺血性脑卒中的脑部 MRI 报告。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212778. eCollection 2019.
6
Text Analysis of Radiology Reports with Signs of Intracranial Hemorrhage on Brain CT Scans Using the Decision Tree Algorithm.基于决策树算法的脑 CT 扫描有颅内出血征象的放射学报告的文本分析。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2022;14(6):34-40. doi: 10.17691/stm2022.14.6.04. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Natural Language Processing of Radiology Reports in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Predict Radiology Resource Utilization.肝细胞癌患者放射学报告的自然语言处理以预测放射学资源利用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jun;16(6):840-844. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
8
Integrating Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms to Categorize Oncologic Response in Radiology Reports.将自然语言处理和机器学习算法集成到放射学报告中的肿瘤反应分类中。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Apr;31(2):178-184. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0027-x.
9
Social Reminiscence in Older Adults' Everyday Conversations: Automated Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.老年人日常对话中的社会怀旧:使用自然语言处理和机器学习的自动检测。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e19133. doi: 10.2196/19133.
10
Automated Outcome Classification of Computed Tomography Imaging Reports for Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤计算机断层扫描成像报告的自动结果分类
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):171-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12859. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Language Models in Spine Surgery: A Promising Technology.脊柱外科中的大语言模型:一项有前景的技术。
HSS J. 2025 May 29:15563316251340696. doi: 10.1177/15563316251340696.
2
Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.神经外科中的深度学习:一项系统的文献综述,并对各亚专业的应用进行结构化分析。
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1532398. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1532398. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach.弥合手术同意书的读写能力差距:一种人工智能与人类专家的协作方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 8;7(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2.
2
AI-Generated Clinical Summaries Require More Than Accuracy.人工智能生成的临床总结需要的不仅仅是准确性。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):637-638. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0555.
3
Leveraging artificial intelligence in neurosurgery-unveiling ChatGPT for neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports.神经外科中人工智能的应用——探索ChatGPT用于神经外科出院小结和手术报告
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jan 26;166(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05908-3.
4
The Expanding Role of ChatGPT (Chat-Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework.ChatGPT(聊天生成预训练变换器)在神经外科中不断扩大的作用:文献系统综述与概念框架
Cureus. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):e43502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43502. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Health Care Privacy Risks of AI Chatbots.人工智能聊天机器人的医疗保健隐私风险
JAMA. 2023 Jul 25;330(4):311-312. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9618.
6
ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries?ChatGPT:出院小结的未来?
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e107-e108. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Uncharted Waters of Machine and Deep Learning for Surgical Phase Recognition in Neurosurgery.神经外科手术阶段识别的机器和深度学习的未知领域。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
8
Machine Learning in Neuro-Oncology, Epilepsy, Alzheimer's Disease, and Schizophrenia.神经肿瘤学、癫痫、阿尔茨海默病和精神分裂症中的机器学习。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2022;134:349-361. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_39.
9
Toward more accurate documentation in neurosurgical care.朝着神经外科护理更准确的文档记录努力。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Nov;51(5):E11. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.FOCUS21387.
10
Applications of Machine Learning to Imaging of Spinal Disorders: Current Status and Future Directions.机器学习在脊柱疾病成像中的应用:现状与未来方向。
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):23S-29S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220961353.