Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2024 Sep;34(7):310-318. doi: 10.1089/cap.2024.0007. Epub 2024 May 14.
Antipsychotics carry a higher-risk profile than other psychotropic medications and may be prescribed for youth with conditions in which other first-line treatments are more appropriate. This study aimed to evaluate the population-level effect of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) trial, which aimed to reduce person-days of antipsychotic use among participants. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using segmented regression to measure changes in prescribing trends of antipsychotic initiation rates pre-SUAY and post-SUAY trial at four U.S. health systems between 2013 and 2020. In our overall model, adjusted for age and insurance type, antipsychotic initiation rates decreased by 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 1.16, = 0.002) prescriptions per 10,000 person-months before the SUAY trial. In the first quarter following the start of the trial, there was an immediate decrease in the rate of antipsychotic initiations of 6.57 (95% CI: 0.99, 12.15) prescriptions per 10,000 person-months. When comparing the posttrial period to the pretrial period, there was an increase of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.85) prescriptions per 10,000 person-months, but the increasing rate in the posttrial period alone was not statistically significant (0.36 prescriptions per 10,000 person-months, 95% CI: -0.27, 0.99). The declining trend of antipsychotic initiation seen between 2013 and 2018 (pre-SUAY trial) may have naturally reached a level at which prescribing was clinically warranted and appropriate, resulting in a floor effect. The COVID-19 pandemic, which began in the final three quarters of the posttrial period, may also be related to increased antipsychotic medication initiation.
抗精神病药比其他精神药物的风险更高,可能会开给那些其他一线治疗方法更合适的患有疾病的年轻人。本研究旨在评估“青少年安全使用抗精神病药试验”(SUAY)的人群效应,该试验旨在减少参与者的抗精神病药使用天数。我们使用分段回归进行了一项中断时间序列分析,以衡量 2013 年至 2020 年期间美国四个卫生系统在 SUAY 试验之前和之后抗精神病药起始率的处方趋势变化。在我们的总体模型中,根据年龄和保险类型进行调整后,抗精神病药起始率在 SUAY 试验之前每 10000 人月减少 0.73(95%置信区间[CI]:0.30,1.16, = 0.002)处方。在试验开始后的第一个季度,抗精神病药起始率立即下降了 6.57(95%CI:0.99,12.15)处方每 10000 人月。与试验前相比,试验后每 10000 人月增加了 1.09(95%CI:0.32,1.85)处方,但试验后单独增加的速度没有统计学意义(每 10000 人月增加 0.36 处方,95%CI:-0.27,0.99)。2013 年至 2018 年(SUAY 试验前)抗精神病药起始率呈下降趋势,可能已经达到了临床需要和适当的处方水平,因此出现了一个下限效应。始于试验后最后三个季度的 COVID-19 大流行也可能与抗精神病药物起始率的增加有关。