Suppr超能文献

区分创伤后应激障碍的脆弱性和弹性:评估创伤经历、遗传风险和电子健康记录。

Distinguishing vulnerability and resilience to posttraumatic stress disorder evaluating traumatic experiences, genetic risk and electronic health records.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Dr. Einar Martens Research Group for Biological Psychiatry, Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Genetics, Microbiology, and Statistics, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2024 Jul;337:115950. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115950. Epub 2024 May 8.

Abstract

What distinguishes vulnerability and resilience to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains unclear. Levering traumatic experiences reporting, genetic data, and electronic health records (EHR), we investigated and predicted the clinical comorbidities (co-phenome) of PTSD vulnerability and resilience in the UK Biobank (UKB) and All of Us Research Program (AoU), respectively. In 60,354 trauma-exposed UKB participants, we defined PTSD vulnerability and resilience considering PTSD symptoms, trauma burden, and polygenic risk scores. EHR-based phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were conducted to dissect the co-phenomes of PTSD vulnerability and resilience. Significant diagnostic endpoints were applied as weights, yielding a phenotypic risk score (PheRS) to conduct PheWAS of PTSD vulnerability and resilience PheRS in up to 95,761 AoU participants. EHR-based PheWAS revealed three significant phenotypes positively associated with PTSD vulnerability (top association "Sleep disorders") and five outcomes inversely associated with PTSD resilience (top association "Irritable Bowel Syndrome"). In the AoU cohort, PheRS analysis showed a partial inverse relationship between vulnerability and resilience with distinct comorbid associations. While PheRS associations were linked to multiple phenotypes, PheRS showed inverse relationships with eye conditions. Our study unveils phenotypic differences in PTSD vulnerability and resilience, highlighting that these concepts are not simply the absence and presence of PTSD.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)易感性和弹性的区别仍不清楚。利用创伤经历报告、遗传数据和电子健康记录(EHR),我们分别在英国生物库(UKB)和全美国研究计划(AoU)中研究和预测了 PTSD 易感性和弹性的临床共病(共表型)。在 60354 名暴露于创伤的 UKB 参与者中,我们根据 PTSD 症状、创伤负担和多基因风险评分来定义 PTSD 易感性和弹性。进行了基于 EHR 的表型全基因组关联研究(PheWAS),以剖析 PTSD 易感性和弹性的共表型。将显著的诊断终点作为权重,得出表型风险评分(PheRS),用于在多达 95761 名 AoU 参与者中进行 PTSD 易感性和弹性的 PheWAS。基于 EHR 的 PheWAS 揭示了三个与 PTSD 易感性显著相关的阳性表型(最显著的关联是“睡眠障碍”)和五个与 PTSD 弹性显著相关的负向表型(最显著的关联是“肠易激综合征”)。在 AoU 队列中,PheRS 分析显示易感性和弹性之间存在部分反向关系,具有不同的共病关联。虽然 PheRS 关联与多种表型有关,但 PheRS 与眼部疾病呈负相关。我们的研究揭示了 PTSD 易感性和弹性的表型差异,强调了这些概念不仅仅是 PTSD 的缺失和存在。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验