Borgheai Seyyed Bahram, Opri Enrico, Isbaine Faical, Cole Eric, Deligani Roohollah Jafari, Laxpati Nealen, Risk Benjamin B, Willie Jon T, Gross Robert E, Yong Nicholas Au, McIntyre Cameron C, Miocinovic Svjetlana
medRxiv. 2024 May 2:2024.05.01.24306044. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.01.24306044.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD); however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic vs. anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioral responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 PD patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEP) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEP) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts and EMG activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured: 1) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, 2) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway, and 3) amplitudes of very short-latency cEP and motor evoked potentials (mEP) for activation of cortico-spinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the HDP and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.
深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗帕金森病(PD)的一种有效方法;然而,对于刺激时募集的底丘脑通路的了解有限。在此,通过关注刺激波形的极性(阴极与阳极),我们的目标是阐明人脑电刺激背后的生物物理机制。在临床研究中,阴极刺激更容易触发行为反应,但阳极DBS拓宽了治疗窗口。这表明所涉及的神经通路根据刺激极性优先做出反应。为了通过实验比较阴极和阳极底丘脑核(STN)DBS期间治疗相关通路的激活情况,在15例接受DBS植入的PD患者中,通过测量逆向或顺向激活产生的诱发电位来量化通路激活。使用硬膜下皮层脑电图记录皮层诱发电位(cEP),从非刺激触点记录DBS局部诱发电位(DLEP),并从手臂和面部肌肉记录肌电图活动。我们测量了:1)短潜伏期cEP的振幅,先前已证明其反映皮质-STN超直接通路的激活;2)被认为反映STN-苍白球(GP)通路激活的DLEP振幅;3)极短潜伏期cEP和运动诱发电位(mEP)的振幅,用于激活皮质-脊髓/延髓束(CSBT)。我们为每个EP/通路构建募集和强度-持续时间曲线,以比较不同刺激极性的兴奋性。我们将实验数据与最先进的DBS计算模型进行了比较。我们的结果提供了实验证据,表明皮层下阴极和阳极刺激在STN区域激活相同的通路,并且阴极刺激通常更有效。然而,不同通路的相对效率有所不同,因此阳极刺激在激活CSBT方面效率最低,在激活HDP方面效率更高,在激活STN-GP通路方面与阴极刺激效率相同。我们的实验证实了关于中枢神经系统神经激活的生物物理模型预测,并提供证据表明刺激极性对通过的轴突、终末突触和局部神经元有不同影响。将实验结果与临床DBS研究进行比较,进一步证明超直接通路可能参与DBS的治疗机制。