Suppr超能文献

丘脑底区域的神经通路激活取决于刺激极性。

Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.

作者信息

Borgheai Seyyed Bahram, Opri Enrico, Isbaine Faical, Cole Eric, Deligani Roohollah Jafari, Laxpati Nealen, Risk Benjamin B, Willie Jon T, Gross Robert E, Yong Nicholas Au, McIntyre Cameron C, Miocinovic Svjetlana

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 May 2:2024.05.01.24306044. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.01.24306044.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD); however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic vs. anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioral responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 PD patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEP) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEP) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts and EMG activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured: 1) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, 2) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway, and 3) amplitudes of very short-latency cEP and motor evoked potentials (mEP) for activation of cortico-spinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the HDP and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.

摘要

深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗帕金森病(PD)的一种有效方法;然而,对于刺激时募集的底丘脑通路的了解有限。在此,通过关注刺激波形的极性(阴极与阳极),我们的目标是阐明人脑电刺激背后的生物物理机制。在临床研究中,阴极刺激更容易触发行为反应,但阳极DBS拓宽了治疗窗口。这表明所涉及的神经通路根据刺激极性优先做出反应。为了通过实验比较阴极和阳极底丘脑核(STN)DBS期间治疗相关通路的激活情况,在15例接受DBS植入的PD患者中,通过测量逆向或顺向激活产生的诱发电位来量化通路激活。使用硬膜下皮层脑电图记录皮层诱发电位(cEP),从非刺激触点记录DBS局部诱发电位(DLEP),并从手臂和面部肌肉记录肌电图活动。我们测量了:1)短潜伏期cEP的振幅,先前已证明其反映皮质-STN超直接通路的激活;2)被认为反映STN-苍白球(GP)通路激活的DLEP振幅;3)极短潜伏期cEP和运动诱发电位(mEP)的振幅,用于激活皮质-脊髓/延髓束(CSBT)。我们为每个EP/通路构建募集和强度-持续时间曲线,以比较不同刺激极性的兴奋性。我们将实验数据与最先进的DBS计算模型进行了比较。我们的结果提供了实验证据,表明皮层下阴极和阳极刺激在STN区域激活相同的通路,并且阴极刺激通常更有效。然而,不同通路的相对效率有所不同,因此阳极刺激在激活CSBT方面效率最低,在激活HDP方面效率更高,在激活STN-GP通路方面与阴极刺激效率相同。我们的实验证实了关于中枢神经系统神经激活的生物物理模型预测,并提供证据表明刺激极性对通过的轴突、终末突触和局部神经元有不同影响。将实验结果与临床DBS研究进行比较,进一步证明超直接通路可能参与DBS的治疗机制。

相似文献

1
Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.
medRxiv. 2024 May 2:2024.05.01.24306044. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.01.24306044.
2
Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.
Brain Commun. 2025 Jan 21;7(1):fcaf006. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf006. eCollection 2025.
3
Model-based deconstruction of cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug 1;120(2):662-680. doi: 10.1152/jn.00862.2017. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Cortical Potentials Evoked by Subthalamic Stimulation Demonstrate a Short Latency Hyperdirect Pathway in Humans.
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 24;38(43):9129-9141. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1327-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Subthalamic deep brain stimulation of an anatomically detailed model of the human hyperdirect pathway.
J Neurophysiol. 2022 May 1;127(5):1209-1220. doi: 10.1152/jn.00004.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
6
Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation.
Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):549-563. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Effects of antidromic and orthodromic activation of STN afferent axons during DBS in Parkinson's disease: a simulation study.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Mar 19;8:32. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00032. eCollection 2014.
8
Direct Activation of Primary Motor Cortex during Subthalamic But Not Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation.
J Neurosci. 2020 Mar 4;40(10):2166-2177. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2480-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Deep brain stimulation of terminating axons.
Brain Stimul. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):1863-1870. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验