Zhang Qingyuan, Ouyang Quchang, Li Wei, Chiu Joanne, Yan Min, Lu Yen-Shen, Sun Sanyuan, Li Huiping, Du Yingying, Wang Xujuan, Sun Tao, Yin Yongmei, Wang Haibo, Ye Feng, Shen Kunwei, Wang Jingfen, Pan Yueyin, Wang Shusen, Yang Jin, Wu Xiaohong, Dai Ming-Shen, Cheng Jing, Teng Yuee, Su Fang, Wu Xinhong, He Jingdong, Fu Peifen, Yang Lulu, Xin Yuan, Wang Xiaojia, Jiang Zefei
Department of Breast Cancer, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 31;3:31. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-22-35. eCollection 2022.
Trastuzumab is the recommended first-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in China, but therapeutic resistance to trastuzumab and other early-line treatments is common and late-line treatment options are limited. Derived from the same murine precursor antibody, margetuximab has enhanced anti-tumor activity compared with trastuzumab and may be an effective late-line treatment. However, data regarding the use of margetuximab in pre-treated Chinese patients are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of margetuximab plus chemotherapy trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients, and to determine whether the results are consistent with the clinical benefit of margetuximab observed in the pivotal global phase III study.
In this randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II bridging study, eligible Chinese patients pretreated with ≥2 lines of anti-HER2 therapies were randomized 1:1 by stratified block randomization to margetuximab (15 mg/kg over at least 120 minutes) or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg over at least 30 minutes), each administered intravenously once every 21-day cycle and plus chemotherapy. Disease assessment was conducted once every two treatment cycles (6 weeks ± 7 days). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Between February 4, 2020 and February 23, 2021, 123 patients were randomized to the margetuximab (n=62) and trastuzumab (n=61) arms. Among them, 15 and 7 patients, respectively, were still on study treatment as of data cut-off (September 3, 2021). Overall, 99.2% were female, median age was 53 years old. All patients were pretreated with trastuzumab, and 83.7% and 25.2%, respectively, were pretreated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and pertuzumab. Baseline characteristics were numerically balanced between arms. BICR-assessed median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.1 months in the trastuzumab arm, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-1.12], which met the consistency criterion (HR <0.88) for bridging success. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 5.5 months in the margetuximab arm and 4.0 months in the trastuzumab arm (HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.96). Median OS (mOS) was not yet reached. Both ORR and CBR were greater in the margetuximab arm (25.5% 12.5%; 32.7% 14.3%). Safety results were numerically comparable between the two arms. Anti-HER2 treatment-related infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were more common in the margetuximab arm than in the trastuzumab arm (12.9% 1.7%). All IRRs could be resolved.
Margetuximab was effective and well-tolerated in this study, supporting its clinical use in pretreated HER2-positive MBC patients in China.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04262804.
在中国,曲妥珠单抗是推荐用于人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的一线治疗药物,但对曲妥珠单抗和其他早期治疗产生耐药很常见,且晚期治疗选择有限。玛格妥昔单抗与曲妥珠单抗源自同一鼠源前体抗体,但其抗肿瘤活性增强,可能是一种有效的晚期治疗药物。然而,关于玛格妥昔单抗在中国经治患者中的应用数据较少。本研究旨在评估玛格妥昔单抗联合化疗对比曲妥珠单抗联合化疗在中国患者中的疗效和安全性,并确定结果是否与在关键的全球III期研究中观察到的玛格妥昔单抗的临床获益一致。
在这项随机、开放标签、多中心II期桥接研究中,符合条件的接受过≥2线抗HER2治疗的中国患者通过分层区组随机化以1:1的比例随机分配至玛格妥昔单抗组(15mg/kg,至少120分钟)或曲妥珠单抗组(6mg/kg,至少30分钟),每组均每21天静脉给药1次并联合化疗。每两个治疗周期(6周±7天)进行一次疾病评估。主要终点是由盲态独立中央审查(BICR)评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、研究者评估的PFS、客观缓解率(ORR)、缓解持续时间(DoR)、临床获益率(CBR)以及治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率和严重程度。
在2020年2月4日至2021年2月23日期间,123例患者被随机分配至玛格妥昔单抗组(n = 62)和曲妥珠单抗组(n = 61)。截至数据截止(2021年9月3日),分别有15例和7例患者仍在接受研究治疗。总体而言,99.2%为女性,中位年龄为53岁。所有患者均接受过曲妥珠单抗治疗,分别有83.7%和25.2%的患者接受过酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和帕妥珠单抗治疗。两组的基线特征在数值上均衡。BICR评估的玛格妥昔单抗组中位PFS(mPFS)为5.5个月,曲妥珠单抗组为4.1个月,风险比(HR)为0.69[95%置信区间(CI):0.43 - 1.12],符合桥接成功的一致性标准(HR < 0.88)。研究者评估的玛格妥昔单抗组中位PFS为5.5个月,曲妥珠单抗组为4.0个月(HR = 0.63;9%CI:0.41 - 0.96)。中位OS(mOS)尚未达到。玛格妥昔单抗组的ORR和CBR均更高(分别为25.5%对12.5%;32.7%对14.3%)。两组的安全性结果在数值上相当。与抗HER2治疗相关的输注相关反应(IRR)在玛格妥昔单抗组比曲妥珠单抗组更常见(12.9%对1.7%)。所有IRR均可缓解。
在本研究中,玛格妥昔单抗有效且耐受性良好,支持其在中国HER2阳性MBC经治患者中的临床应用。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04262804。