Bown R L, Martin B K, Geddawi M
Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(8):548-51. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109633.
A study was carried out in 10 healthy subjects to compare the faecal blood loss caused by pirazolac, a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and diclofenac sodium, using chromium51-labelled red blood cells. After 1 week on placebo, subjects received at random either 200 mg pirazolac 3-times daily or 50 mg diclofenac sodium 3-times daily for 7 days. They were then crossed over to the alternative medication for a further 7 days, preceded and followed by 1 week on placebo. Stool samples were collected and bulked for each day and total blood loss over 14 days (7 days on treatment and 7 days immediately after) was calculated for each period. The results showed that both drugs caused a greater blood loss than that measured in the placebo run-in period, and diclofenac sodium caused significantly greater blood loss than did pirazolac. Three subjects reported gastro-intestinal side-effects during diclofenac sodium treatment but there were no reports of any side-effects whilst subjects were receiving pirazolac.
对10名健康受试者进行了一项研究,使用铬51标记的红细胞比较一种新型非甾体抗炎药吡唑酸和双氯芬酸钠引起的粪便失血情况。在服用安慰剂1周后,受试者随机接受每日3次、每次200毫克的吡唑酸或每日3次、每次50毫克的双氯芬酸钠,持续7天。然后他们交叉服用另一种药物,再持续7天,前后各有1周服用安慰剂。每天收集粪便样本并合并,计算每个阶段14天(治疗7天和治疗后立即7天)的总失血量。结果表明,两种药物引起的失血量均高于安慰剂导入期测量的失血量,且双氯芬酸钠引起的失血量明显高于吡唑酸。三名受试者在服用双氯芬酸钠治疗期间报告了胃肠道副作用,但在受试者服用吡唑酸期间没有任何副作用报告。