Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai-Fu-Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), Beijing, 100730, China.
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jul;43(7):2237-2244. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06986-5. Epub 2024 May 18.
This study aimed to classify idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients with cardiac involvement (IIM-CI) into different categories based on their clinical phenotypes via cluster analysis and to explore their differences in outcomes.
IIM-CI patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2015 to June 2021 were retrieved. The clinical data, laboratory examinations, and treatment were retrospectively reviewed, and the outcome was traced. A second-order clustering method was employed for categorization.
A total of 88 IIM-CI patients were enrolled in this study and were classified into two categories through cluster analysis. Category I consisted of patients who exhibited distinct cardiac structural and functional changes, such as enlargement of atriums and/or ventricles, along with the remarkable heart insufficiency biomarkers, whereas patients of category II displayed more widely systemic injuries and intensive skeletal muscle weakness. In comparison, pulmonary hypertension (58.8% vs 16.7%, p < 0.01), arrhythmia (82.4% vs 27.8%, p < 0.01), and positive serum anti-mitochondrial-M2 antibody (52.9% vs 5.6%, p < 0.01) were more prevalent in category I than in category II, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (1703.5 pg/L vs 364.0 pg/L, p = 0.02) were significantly elevated in category I, whereas skeletal muscle weakness (50.0% vs 74.1%, p = 0.02), interstitial lung disease (20.6% vs 63.0%, p < 0.01), skin rash (11.8% vs 48.1%, p < 0.01), arthralgia (2.9% vs 27.8%, p < 0.01), fever (2.9% vs 27.8%, p < 0.01), and dysphagia (2.9% vs 22.2%, p < 0.01) were more common in category II patients. Heart failure was the primary cause of death in category I, but severe pneumonia was predominantly responsible for deaths in category II.
Two categories of IIM-CI were identified based on clinical features with distinctive characteristics. Two categories exhibited differences in clinical manifestations, autoantibody profiles, and the primary cause of death.
本研究旨在通过聚类分析,根据临床表型将特发性炎性肌病合并心脏受累(IIM-CI)患者分为不同类别,并探讨其结局差异。
回顾性检索 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间北京协和医院收治的 IIM-CI 患者的临床资料、实验室检查及治疗情况,并随访结局。采用二阶聚类法进行分类。
本研究共纳入 88 例 IIM-CI 患者,通过聚类分析分为两类。第 1 类患者表现为心房和(或)心室明显扩大、显著的心功能不全生物标志物等心脏结构和功能改变,而第 2 类患者则表现为更广泛的全身损伤和严重的骨骼肌无力。与第 2 类相比,第 1 类患者更易出现肺动脉高压(58.8%比 16.7%,p<0.01)、心律失常(82.4%比 27.8%,p<0.01)和血清抗线粒体 M2 抗体阳性(52.9%比 5.6%,p<0.01),血清 N 末端脑利钠肽前体水平(1703.5 pg/L 比 364.0 pg/L,p=0.02)明显升高,而骨骼肌无力(50.0%比 74.1%,p=0.02)、间质性肺病(20.6%比 63.0%,p<0.01)、皮疹(11.8%比 48.1%,p<0.01)、关节炎(2.9%比 27.8%,p<0.01)、发热(2.9%比 27.8%,p<0.01)和吞咽困难(2.9%比 22.2%,p<0.01)更常见于第 2 类患者。第 1 类患者的主要死亡原因为心力衰竭,而第 2 类患者的主要死亡原因为重症肺炎。
根据临床特征,本研究将 IIM-CI 患者分为两类,具有不同的特征。两类患者在临床表现、自身抗体谱和主要死亡原因方面存在差异。