CINTESIS - Centre for Health Technologies and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Health Data Science PhD Program, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; MEDCIDS - Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Portuguese Institute of Oncology at Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Group of Epidemiology, Results, Economy and Management in Oncology, GEREMO (GEREMO) Centro de Investigação, Porto, Portugal.
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2024;40:100818. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100818. Epub 2024 May 11.
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Hormone Receptor-positive (HR+) and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype, predominantly treated with endocrine therapy. The efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in this context remains to be fully evaluated. MATERIALS (OR PATIENTS) AND METHODS: This study compared the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib and ribociclib) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant against endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. The main focus was on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study involved a population treated exclusively with endocrine therapy for bone involvement, examining median OS and PFS, and adjusting for variables like stage, visceral metastasis, age, and treatment line. RESULTS: The study found no significant OS difference between treatments with palbociclib, ribociclib, and endocrine therapy alone. However, ribociclib combined with letrozole significantly improved PFS over letrozole alone. Propensity score weighting indicated a potential 50 % reduction in death risk with ribociclib compared to palbociclib, though this was not confirmed by cox regression. CONCLUSION: CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly ribociclib in combination with letrozole, show promise in improving outcomes for HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. While palbociclib may not be superior to traditional endocrine therapy, the results underscore the need for further research. These findings could influence future treatment protocols, emphasizing the importance of personalized therapy in this patient group.
简介/背景:激素受体阳性(HR+)和人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HER2-)乳腺癌是最常见的亚型,主要采用内分泌治疗。CDK4/6 抑制剂联合内分泌治疗在这种情况下的疗效仍有待充分评估。 材料(或患者)和方法:本研究比较了 CDK4/6 抑制剂(帕博西尼和瑞博西林)联合芳香酶抑制剂或氟维司群与单独内分泌治疗在 HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌患者中的疗效。主要重点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。该研究涉及专门接受内分泌治疗骨骼受累的患者人群,研究了中位 OS 和 PFS,并根据分期、内脏转移、年龄和治疗线等变量进行了调整。 结果:研究发现,帕博西尼、瑞博西林与单独内分泌治疗在 OS 方面无显著差异。然而,瑞博西林联合来曲唑与来曲唑单药治疗相比,PFS 显著改善。倾向评分加权表明,与帕博西尼相比,瑞博西林可能降低 50%的死亡风险,但 Cox 回归并未证实这一点。 结论:CDK4/6 抑制剂,特别是瑞博西林联合来曲唑,有望改善 HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者的预后。虽然帕博西尼可能并不优于传统内分泌治疗,但这些结果强调了进一步研究的必要性。这些发现可能会影响未来的治疗方案,强调了在这一患者群体中进行个体化治疗的重要性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019-8-1
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019-1
Curr Oncol. 2025-3-12