Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, Ferrara, 44124, Italy.
Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Aug;57(6):918-928. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-02998-9. Epub 2024 May 18.
Hemodynamic assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a fundamental component of early risk stratification that in turn, influences subsequent monitoring and therapeutic strategies. The current body of literature and international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines focus mainly on the use of systolic blood pressure (SBP). The accuracy of this single hemodynamic parameter, however, and its optimal values for the identification of hemodynamic instability have been recently questioned by clinicians. For example, abnormal SBP or shock index may be a late indicator of adverse outcomes, signaling a patient in whom the cascade of hemodynamic compromise is already well underway. The aim of the present article is to review the current evidence supporting the use of SBP and analyze the potential integration of other parameters to assess the hemodynamic stability, impending clinical deterioration, and guide the reperfusion treatment in patients with PE, as well as to suggest potential strategies to further investigate this issue.
对肺栓塞(PE)患者进行血流动力学评估仍然是早期风险分层的基本组成部分,这反过来又会影响后续的监测和治疗策略。目前的文献和国际循证临床实践指南主要集中在收缩压(SBP)的使用上。然而,最近临床医生对这一单一血流动力学参数的准确性及其识别血流动力学不稳定的最佳值提出了质疑。例如,异常的 SBP 或休克指数可能是不良预后的晚期指标,表明患者的血流动力学恶化已经在进行中。本文的目的是回顾支持使用 SBP 的现有证据,并分析潜在整合其他参数来评估血流动力学稳定性、即将发生的临床恶化以及指导 PE 患者再灌注治疗的可能性,同时提出进一步研究这一问题的潜在策略。