• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018 年供者分配结构调整后适应性变化及患者生存情况分析:UNOS 数据库分析

Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.

机构信息

From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359. Epub 2024 May 22.

DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359
PMID:38768050
Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to characterize adaptive changes to the revised United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation policy and estimate long-term survival trends for heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

Patients listed for HTx between October 17, 2013 and September 30, 2021 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, and stratified into pre- and postpolicy revision groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine trends in device utilization for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), microaxial support (Impella), and no mechanical circulatory support (non-MCS). Survival data post-HTx were fitted to parametric distributions and extrapolated to 5 years.

RESULTS

We identified 27,523 HTx waitlist candidates during the study period, most of whom (n = 16,376) were waitlisted in the prepolicy change period. Overall, 19,554 patients underwent HTx during the study period (pre: 12,037 and post: 7517). Listings increased after the policy change for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients. Listings for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients decreased. HTx increased for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients after the policy change and decreased for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients. Waitlist survival increased for the overall ( P < 0.01), ECMO ( P < 0.01), IABP ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) groups. Waitlist survival did not differ for the LVAD ( P = 0.8) and Impella ( P = 0.1) groups. Post-transplant survival decreased for the overall ( P < 0.01), LVAD ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Allocation policy revisions have contributed to greater utilization of ECMO, Impella, and IABP, decreased utilization of LVADs and non-MCS, increased waitlist survival, and decreased post-HTx survival.

摘要

目的

我们旨在描述对修订后的美国器官共享网络供体心脏分配政策的适应性变化进行特征描述,并估计心脏移植(HTx)受者的长期生存趋势。

方法

从美国器官共享网络数据库中确定了 2013 年 10 月 17 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间接受 HTx 的患者,并将其分为政策修订前和修订后组。进行了亚组分析,以检查体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)、耐用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)、主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)、微轴支撑(Impella)和无机械循环支持(非-MCS)设备利用趋势。HTx 后生存数据拟合到参数分布,并外推至 5 年。

结果

在研究期间,我们确定了 27523 名 HTx 候补名单候选人,其中大多数(n=16376)在政策变更前被列入候补名单。总体而言,在研究期间有 19554 名患者接受了 HTx(前:12037 名,后:7517 名)。政策变更后,ECMO(P<0.01)、Impella(P<0.01)和 IABP(P<0.01)患者的名单增加。LVAD(P<0.01)和非-MCS(P<0.01)患者的名单减少。ECMO(P<0.01)、Impella(P<0.01)和 IABP(P<0.01)患者的 HTx 增加,LVAD(P<0.01)和非-MCS(P<0.01)患者的 HTx 减少。总体而言(P<0.01)、ECMO(P<0.01)、IABP(P<0.01)和非-MCS(P<0.01)组的候补名单生存时间增加。LVAD(P=0.8)和 Impella(P=0.1)组的候补名单生存时间无差异。整体(P<0.01)、LVAD(P<0.01)和非-MCS(P<0.01)人群的移植后生存时间下降。

结论

分配政策修订有助于 ECMO、Impella 和 IABP 的更多利用,LVAD 和非-MCS 的利用减少,候补名单生存时间增加,HTx 后生存时间减少。

相似文献

1
Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.2018 年供者分配结构调整后适应性变化及患者生存情况分析:UNOS 数据库分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Impact of using higher-risk donor hearts for candidates with pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support.使用具有移植前机械循环支持的高危供心对受者的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Feb;41(2):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Impact of Left Ventricular Unloading on Outcome of Heart Transplant Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in New Allocation Policy.新分配政策下体外膜肺氧合支持下心移植桥接中左心室卸载对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033590. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033590. Epub 2024 May 14.
4
The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.OPTN 政策变化对具有耐用性左心室辅助装置和慢性肾脏病患者的影响:UNOS 数据库分析。
Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;48(10):1180-1189. doi: 10.1111/aor.14770. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.使用临时机械循环支持在器官共享联合网络供心分配系统改变前后管理心原性休克。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):703-708. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0692.
6
Three-Year Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy After Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change.心脏移植分配评分改变后三年左心室辅助装置的结果和策略。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
7
Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intraaortic Balloon Pump as a Bridge to Transplant.微创左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏在移植桥接中的应用比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jul;114(1):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.048. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.可接受的心脏移植术后结果支持在新的 OPTN|UNOS 心脏分配政策中优先考虑临时 MCS。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jan-Feb;53(1):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes.心脏移植前临时机械循环支持的发生率及其对移植后结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Sep;37(9):1060-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Influence of Transplant Center Procedural Volume on Survival Outcomes of Heart Transplantation for Children Bridged with Mechanical Circulatory Support.移植中心手术量对接受机械循环支持的儿童心脏移植生存结局的影响。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):280-288. doi: 10.1007/s00246-016-1510-8. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Charting the Course for Careers in Interventional Heart Failure: Training, Challenges, and Future Directions.绘制介入性心力衰竭领域职业发展路径:培训、挑战与未来方向
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 12;4(3Part A):102569. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102569. eCollection 2025 Mar.