Suppr超能文献

姑息精神病学:研究、临床和教育重点。

Palliative psychiatry: research, clinical, and educational priorities.

机构信息

University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2024 May;13(3):542-557. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-471. Epub 2024 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative psychiatry has been proposed as a new clinical construct within mental health care and aims to improve quality of life (QoL) for individuals experiencing severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). To date, explorations of palliative psychiatry have been largely theoretical, and more work is needed to develop its approaches into tangible clinical practice.

METHODS

In this paper, we synthesize existing literature with discussions held at a one-day knowledge user meeting titled "A Community of Practice for Palliative Psychiatry" to generate priorities for research, clinical practice, and education that will help advance the development of palliative psychiatry.

RESULTS

Palliative psychiatry will benefit from research that is co-produced by people with lived experience (PWLE) of mental illness, that clarifies contested concepts within mental health care and wider medicine, and that adapts existing interventions that have the potential to improve the QoL of individuals experiencing SPMI into the mental health care context. Specific methods and tools might be developed for use in clinical spaces taking a palliative psychiatry approach. More work must be done to understand the populations that might benefit from palliative psychiatry, and to mitigate mental health care providers' (MHCPs') anxieties about using these approaches in their work. As palliative psychiatry is developed, current MHCPs, trainees, individuals experiencing SPMI, and their loved ones will all require education about and orientation to this novel approach within mental health care.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several priorities in research, clinical practice, and education that can help advance the development of palliative psychiatry. All future work must be considered through a human rights-based, anti-oppressive lens. Research projects, clinical models, and educational initiatives should all be developed in co-production with PWLE to mitigate the epistemic injustices common in mental health care.

摘要

背景

姑息精神病学已被提议作为精神卫生保健领域的一个新的临床结构,旨在提高患有严重和持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的个体的生活质量(QoL)。迄今为止,姑息精神病学的探索在很大程度上是理论性的,需要做更多的工作来将其方法发展为切实可行的临床实践。

方法

在本文中,我们综合了现有文献和为期一天的知识用户会议“姑息精神病学实践社区”的讨论,以确定有助于推进姑息精神病学发展的研究、临床实践和教育方面的优先事项。

结果

姑息精神病学将受益于与精神疾病患者经历(PWLE)共同开展的研究,这些研究阐明了精神卫生保健和更广泛的医学领域有争议的概念,并调整了有可能改善 SPMI 患者生活质量的现有干预措施,使其适应精神卫生保健环境。具体的方法和工具可能会为采用姑息精神病学方法的临床空间开发。必须做更多的工作来了解可能从姑息精神病学中受益的人群,并减轻精神卫生保健提供者(MHCPs)在工作中使用这些方法的焦虑。随着姑息精神病学的发展,目前的 MHCP、受训人员、患有 SPMI 的个体及其亲人都需要接受关于这一新的精神卫生保健方法的教育和定位。

结论

在研究、临床实践和教育方面有几个优先事项可以帮助推进姑息精神病学的发展。所有未来的工作都必须通过基于人权、反压迫的视角来考虑。研究项目、临床模式和教育计划都应与 PWLE 共同开发,以减轻精神卫生保健中常见的认识不公正现象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验