Bolcato Matteo, Jommi Claudio
Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 6;15:1375891. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1375891. eCollection 2024.
This paper describes the peculiarities of the plasma-derived medicinal product (PDMP) market and illustrates the results of a review of the literature on policies aimed at counteracting the shortage of PDMPs. Plasma is primarily used for the industrial production of blood products (80%). The demand for PDMPs, particularly immunoglobulins (IGs), is increasing. However, the production of PDMPs is complex, long (712 months), and expensive, accounting, according to US estimates, for 57% of the total costs of PDMPs compared to 14% for small molecules. Unexpected increases in clinical need cannot be addressed in the short term. Once the demand for some diseases is satisfied, the collection and fractionation of plasma will only be used to supply some specific patients. Hence, the full weight of the marginal costs, which remain constant, are borne by a few products. According to last liter economics, the industry stops producing when the marginal revenue equals the marginal cost, thereby reducing the convenience of producing the most commonly used PDMPs (albumin and IG). The imbalance between the demand and supply of PDMPs was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which further increased the cost of plasma collection. Policies to counteract this imbalance have also been discussed. If the demand is inappropriate, it should be reduced. If the demand is appropriate and supply cannot be increased, the demand should be prioritized for patients for whom PDMPs are the only available treatment. If the shortage depends on insufficient supply and technical and allocative efficiency, both production and supply should be improved, together with incentives for all stakeholders involved in the PDMP market to increase the sustainability of production/supply. The paper is focused on this second issue, that is supply-driven unbalance.
本文描述了血浆衍生药品(PDMP)市场的特点,并阐述了针对应对PDMP短缺的政策的文献综述结果。血浆主要用于血液制品的工业生产(80%)。对PDMP的需求,尤其是免疫球蛋白(IGs),正在增加。然而,PDMP的生产复杂、耗时久(7 - 12个月)且成本高昂,据美国估计,与小分子药物14%的总成本相比,PDMP的总成本中这部分占57%。临床需求的意外增加在短期内无法得到解决。一旦某些疾病的需求得到满足,血浆的采集和分馏将仅用于供应某些特定患者。因此,保持不变的边际成本的全部负担由少数产品承担。根据最新的经济学理论,当边际收益等于边际成本时,该行业就会停止生产,从而降低了生产最常用的PDMP(白蛋白和IG)的便利性。COVID - 19大流行加剧了PDMP供需之间的不平衡,这进一步增加了血浆采集的成本。针对这种不平衡的政策也已得到讨论。如果需求不合理,就应予以减少。如果需求合理但无法增加供应,那么应优先满足那些PDMP是唯一可用治疗手段的患者的需求。如果短缺是由于供应不足以及技术和分配效率问题导致的,那么就应同时提高生产和供应,并激励PDMP市场的所有利益相关者提高生产/供应的可持续性。本文关注的是第二个问题,即供应驱动的不平衡。