Purdue University, 703 3rd Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Sep;52(9):1343-1356. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01206-9. Epub 2024 May 21.
Emotional dysregulation is increasingly recognized as important to the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype alongside inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity. Studies of ADHD have relied primarily on trait-based conceptualizations that emphasize stability of symptoms across moderate developmental timescales (i.e., months to years). Trait-based conceptualizations provide a critical view but fail to account for short-term dynamic variations in the expression of ADHD symptoms and emotion. This leaves a gap in our understanding of the short-term variation in ADHD symptom expression and the dynamic relationships among ADHD symptoms and emotion. Here, we assessed caregiver report of ADHD symptoms and positive and negative emotion using ecological momentary approaches over 2 weeks in a sample of 36 children with and without ADHD between the ages of 7-12 years old. Between-person (R) and within-person (R) reliability were estimated. Multilevel models tested specific covariation hypotheses between ADHD symptoms and emotion. Analyses confirmed that ADHD and emotion ratings were reliable as individual differences (i.e., between-person; R range 0.93-1.0) and moment-to-moment change (i.e., within-person; R range 0.66-0.88) measures. Multilevel models found little evidence for lagged effects between domains, but consistently identified concurrent expression of ADHD symptoms and emotions; inattention covaried most strongly with negative emotion and hyperactivity-impulsivity covaried most strongly with positive emotion. Results demonstrate the importance of complementing trait-level conceptualizations with assessment of momentary dynamics. Momentary assessment suggests important covariation of ADHD symptoms and emotion as part of the ADHD phenotype.
情绪调节越来越被认为是与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)表型相关的重要因素,与注意力不集中和多动冲动并列。ADHD 的研究主要依赖于基于特质的概念化,强调症状在适度发展时间尺度(即数月至数年)上的稳定性。基于特质的概念化提供了一个重要的视角,但未能解释 ADHD 症状和情绪表达的短期动态变化。这使得我们对 ADHD 症状表达的短期变化以及 ADHD 症状和情绪之间的动态关系的理解存在差距。在这里,我们使用生态瞬时方法在 7-12 岁的 ADHD 儿童和非 ADHD 儿童样本中进行了为期 2 周的研究,评估了照顾者对 ADHD 症状和积极及消极情绪的报告。评估了个体间(R)和个体内(R)可靠性。多层次模型检验了 ADHD 症状和情绪之间的具体协变假设。分析证实,ADHD 和情绪评分作为个体差异(即个体间;R 范围为 0.93-1.0)和随时间变化的测量(即个体内;R 范围为 0.66-0.88)是可靠的。多层次模型发现,在域之间几乎没有滞后效应的证据,但一致地识别了 ADHD 症状和情绪的同时表达;注意力不集中与消极情绪的相关性最强,多动冲动与积极情绪的相关性最强。结果表明,用即时动态评估来补充特质水平的概念化非常重要。瞬时评估表明,ADHD 症状和情绪之间存在重要的协同变化,这是 ADHD 表型的一部分。