Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and trust: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND

The use of physician extenders (e.g., nurse practitioners [NPs] and physician assistants [PAs]) has risen in recent years in the U.S. health care domain, yet some scholars have questioned if physician extenders are being fully utilized in the health care field.

PURPOSES

The purpose of this research was to conduct a systematic review to determine if trust in the NP/PA might be influential in the ways these professionals are utilized. We view trust through the lens of Mayer et al. and their model of organizational trust, and we seek to examine how patients, physicians, and NPs/PAs themselves view one another.

METHODS

This systematic review spanned from 1996 to 2022 and applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses strategy. The final sample consisted of 29 articles.

RESULTS

The findings point to how the antecedents of trust according to Mayer et al.; i.e., trustee's ability, benevolence, and integrity) influence the trusting relationships between patients and NPs/PAs and between physicians and NPs/PAs. Consequences and outcomes of trust are also discussed. Importantly, a trustor's propensity to trust and repeat interactions over time (e.g., feedback loop) is influential to trusting relationships.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These findings offer health care organizations insight into the mechanisms for building trust as physician extenders become more prominent in the health care field.