Senior Clinical Development Scientist and Medical-Dental Safety Officer, Philips Oral Healthcare, Bothell, Washington.
Associate Director, Biostatistics, Philips Oral Healthcare, Bothell, Washington.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2024 Mar;45(Suppl 1):14-17.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different interdental oral cleaning modalities on gingivitis and plaque following a 6-week period of home use. This was a randomized, four-arm, parallel design clinical trial. Study subjects were manual toothbrush (MTB) users with moderate to severe gingivitis, aged 18 to 65 years. Subjects were required at baseline to have a gingival bleeding score of ≥1 on at least 50 gingival sites per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and to have an overall plaque score of ≥0.6 per the Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) following a 3- to 6-hour plaque accumulation period. Subjects were randomly assigned to use one of four oral care cleaning modalities: (1) NON group: MTB alone, (2) FLS group: MTB plus string floss, (3) IDB group: MTB plus an interdental brush, or (4) CPF group: MTB plus the Philips® Sonicare® Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle. Efficacy measures (Modified Gingival Index [MGI], GBI, and RMNPI) and safety were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 as measured by the MGI. Of the 372 subjects randomized in the study, 364 completed a post-baseline MGI evaluation and were included in the analyses. The adjusted mean percent reduction in gingival inflammation from baseline to week 6 was -2.10% for the NON group, 2.82% for the FLS group, 2.60% for the IDB group, and 29.10% for the CPF group. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the CPF group was statistically significantly different from the NON, FLS, and IDB groups (.0001). In conclusion, adjunctive use of the Philips Sonicare Cordless Power Flosser with the Quad Stream nozzle and an MTB showed statistically better results in term of reducing gingival inflammation following 6 weeks of home use when compared to an MTB alone, an MTB used with string floss, and an MTB used with an interdental brush.
本研究旨在评估为期 6 周家庭使用后,不同的牙周口腔清洁方式对牙龈炎和菌斑的影响。这是一项随机、四臂、平行设计的临床试验。研究对象为使用手动牙刷(MTB)且患有中重度牙龈炎的 18 至 65 岁患者。受试者在基线时需要满足以下条件:根据牙龈出血指数(GBI),至少 50 个牙龈部位的牙龈出血得分为≥1;根据 Rustogi 改良海军菌斑指数(RMNPI),在经过 3 至 6 小时的菌斑积累后,总的菌斑得分为≥0.6。受试者被随机分配使用以下四种口腔护理清洁方式之一:(1)NON 组:仅使用 MTB;(2)FLS 组:MTB 加牙线;(3)IDB 组:MTB 加牙间刷;(4)CPF 组:MTB 加飞利浦 Sonicare 无绳动力冲牙器配 Quad Stream 喷嘴。在基线、2 周和 6 周时评估疗效测量指标(改良牙龈指数[MGI]、GBI 和 RMNPI)和安全性。主要疗效终点是 MGI 测量的从基线到第 6 周时牙龈炎症的减少程度。在该研究中,372 名随机受试者中有 364 名完成了基线后 MGI 评估并纳入分析。从基线到第 6 周,NON 组的牙龈炎症平均百分比减少了-2.10%,FLS 组为 2.82%,IDB 组为 2.60%,CPF 组为 29.10%。两两比较表明,CPF 组与 NON、FLS 和 IDB 组有统计学差异(<.0001)。结论,与单独使用 MTB、MTB 加牙线和 MTB 加牙间刷相比,在为期 6 周的家庭使用后,使用飞利浦 Sonicare 无绳动力冲牙器配 Quad Stream 喷嘴和 MTB 的辅助治疗在减少牙龈炎症方面显示出统计学上更好的结果。