Physick-Sheard P W
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 1985 Aug;1(2):383-417. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30762-9.
The quality of the overall response to exercise in the horse is very similar to that seen in man and laboratory animals; differences are mainly quantitative and persist when relative body weight is taken into account. The apparently greater flow capacity of the equine muscle bed during maximal whole-body exercise implicates the extent of central circulatory adaptations as the limiting factor in performance but implies a role for increase in arteriolar capacitance/muscle capillarity as an appropriate response to intense endurance training. The blood oxygen-carrying capacity of the horse is often quoted as the major component of the animal's superior aerobic work capacity, although the measured maximal a-vO2 for the horse is only 2 to 3 ml greater than that found in elite athletes. In fact, comparison of published performance data for man and the horse reveals that improved a-vO2 accounts for 23 per cent of the difference, and increased Qc accounts for the remaining 77 per cent of the superior oxygen consumption in the horse. The extent to which the horse can increase Qc and muscle blood flow appears to represent its major adaptations for maximal aerobic performance. It is frequently observed that there have been far greater improvements in human athletic performance than in that of the race-horse, and this difference is usually attributed to the application of scientific training methods to the athlete. It has also been suggested that the horse may have reached the limit of its adaptive ability. The horse has a maximal oxygen pulse of at least 0.6 ml per kg per beat compared with 0.35 for man, a 90 per cent whole body oxygen extraction, and an 80 to 90 per cent higher muscle blood flow, with an overall capability of increasing Vo2 max by 35 times. These represent levels that would appear to be difficult to improve upon. However, insufficient research has been performed to firmly state true maxima for the horse, and current research does not reveal to what extent the horse is capable of responding to even conventional training methods. The relative improvement that such research could reveal would provide some objective guidance to the extent to which further improvement could be anticipated. A consistent finding in the majority of studies reviewed is the tendency for results to show a lack of statistical significance, which is particularly frustrating for a researcher when the trends are consistent with the initial hypotheses. This tendency arises because of small group sizes and inherent variability in the test population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
马对运动的总体反应质量与人类和实验动物非常相似;差异主要是数量上的,在考虑相对体重时依然存在。在最大强度的全身运动中,马的肌肉床明显具有更大的血流量,这表明中枢循环适应程度是运动表现的限制因素,但也意味着小动脉容量/肌肉毛细血管增加在高强度耐力训练中起到了适当的反应作用。马的血液携氧能力常被认为是其卓越有氧工作能力的主要组成部分,尽管测得的马的最大动静脉氧差仅比优秀运动员高2至3毫升。事实上,对已发表的人类和马的运动表现数据进行比较后发现,动静脉氧差的改善占差异的23%,心输出量增加占马更高耗氧量的其余77%。马增加心输出量和肌肉血流量的程度似乎代表了其对最大有氧表现的主要适应。人们经常观察到,人类运动成绩的提高比赛马大得多,这种差异通常归因于科学训练方法应用于运动员。也有人认为马可能已经达到了其适应能力的极限。马的最大氧脉搏至少为每千克每次心跳0.6毫升,而人类为0.35毫升,全身氧摄取率为90%,肌肉血流量高80%至90%,总体上最大摄氧量能提高35倍。这些似乎是难以提高的水平。然而,尚未进行足够的研究来确定马的真正最大值,目前的研究也没有揭示马对常规训练方法的反应能力究竟如何。此类研究可能揭示的相对改善程度将为预期的进一步改善提供一些客观指导。在大多数综述研究中一致发现的结果是,结果往往缺乏统计学意义,当趋势与初始假设一致时,这对研究人员来说尤其令人沮丧。这种趋势的出现是由于样本量小和测试人群固有的变异性。