Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China.
Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China.
Vaccine. 2024 Jul 25;42(19):4072-4080. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 22.
From the perspective of doctor-patient communication, this research used multiple methods combined natural language processing (NLP), a cross-sectional survey and an online experiment to investigated how risk perception influenced people's vaccination intention.
In Study 1, we used Python to crawl 335,045 comments about COVID-19 vaccine published in a social media platform Sina Weibo (equivalent of Twitter in China) from 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2021. Text analysis and sentiment analysis was used to examine how vaccination intention, as measured by linguistic features from the LIWC dictionary, changed with individuals' perceptions of pandemic risk. In Study 2, we adopted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to further test the relation of risk perception, vaccination intention, trust in physicians, and perceived medical recommendations in a Chinese sample (n = 386). In Study 3, we conducted an online experiment where we recruited 127 participants with high trust in physicians and 127 participants with low trust, and subsequently randomly allocated them into one of three conditions: control, rational recommendation, or perceptual recommendation.
Text and sentiment analysis revealed that the use of negative words towards COVID-19 vaccine had a significant decrease at high (vs. low) risk perception level time (Study 1). Trust in physicians mediated the effect of risk perception on vaccination intention and this effect was reinforced for participants with low (vs. high) level of perceived medical recommendation (Study 2), especially for the rational (vs. perceptual) recommendation condition (Study 3).
Risk perception increased vaccination intention through the mediating effect of trust in physicians and the moderating effect of perceived medical recommendations. Rational (vs. perceptual) recommendation is more effective in increasing intention to get vaccinated in people with low trust in physicians.
本研究从医患沟通的角度出发,采用自然语言处理(NLP)、横断面调查和在线实验相结合的方法,探讨了风险感知如何影响人们的疫苗接种意愿。
在研究 1 中,我们使用 Python 从社交媒体平台新浪微博(相当于中国的 Twitter)上抓取了 2020 年 12 月 31 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的关于 COVID-19 疫苗的 335045 条评论。文本分析和情感分析用于研究个体对大流行风险的感知如何通过 LIWC 词典的语言特征来改变疫苗接种意愿。在研究 2 中,我们采用横断面问卷调查进一步测试了在中国样本(n=386)中风险感知、疫苗接种意愿、对医生的信任和感知医疗建议之间的关系。在研究 3 中,我们进行了一项在线实验,招募了 127 名对医生信任度高的参与者和 127 名对医生信任度低的参与者,并随机将他们分配到三个条件之一:对照组、理性建议组或感性建议组。
文本和情感分析表明,在高(低)风险感知水平时,对 COVID-19 疫苗的负面词汇使用量显著减少(研究 1)。对医生的信任度中介了风险感知对疫苗接种意愿的影响,并且这种影响在感知医疗建议水平低(高)的参与者中得到了加强(研究 2),特别是在理性(感性)建议条件下(研究 3)。
风险感知通过对医生的信任的中介作用和感知医疗建议的调节作用增加了疫苗接种意愿。在对医生信任度低的人群中,理性(感性)建议更能有效增加接种疫苗的意愿。