Lundberg Katrina, Elmståhl Sölve, Wranker Lena Sandin, Ekström Henrik
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024 Sep;28(3):330-341. doi: 10.4235/agmr.24.0055. Epub 2024 May 17.
The association between physical frailty and performance in different cognitive domains in the absence of cognitive disorders is poorly understood. Hence, we aimed to explore the associations between frailty levels based on the Fried Physical Frailty Phenotype and performance of different cognitive domains. We also aimed to examine the associations between cognitive function and each criterion in the Fried Frailty Scale using the same cognitive domains in a non-dementia population aged 60-96 years.
This cross-sectional study included 4,329 participants aged 60-96 years, drawn from the "Good Aging in Skåne" population study. Frailty indices included handgrip strength, physical endurance, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and walking speed. Cognitive function was assessed across eight domains: episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, executive function, and visual perception. We constructed adjusted multiple linear regression models for each cognitive domain, with the frailty levels as the independent variable. Likewise, we constructed linear regression models with each cognitive domain as the dependent variable and frailty criteria as independent variables.
Physical frailty was associated with poor performance in episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, and executive functions (p<0.001 for all associations). Weaker hand grip strength was independently associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains (p < 0.015).
Higher levels of frailty were associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains except visual perception. Describing frailty by considering cognitive functioning may provide a better understanding of frailty.
在没有认知障碍的情况下,身体虚弱与不同认知领域表现之间的关联尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在探讨基于弗里德身体虚弱表型的虚弱水平与不同认知领域表现之间的关联。我们还旨在使用相同的认知领域,研究60 - 96岁非痴呆人群中认知功能与弗里德虚弱量表各标准之间的关联。
这项横断面研究纳入了来自“斯科讷地区健康老龄化”人群研究的4329名60 - 96岁参与者。虚弱指标包括握力、身体耐力、体重指数(BMI)、身体活动和步行速度。在八个领域评估认知功能:情景记忆、处理速度、语义记忆、语言流畅性、工作记忆、注意力、执行功能和视觉感知。我们为每个认知领域构建了调整后的多元线性回归模型,以虚弱水平作为自变量。同样,我们构建了以每个认知领域为因变量、虚弱标准为自变量的线性回归模型。
身体虚弱与情景记忆、处理速度、语义记忆、语言流畅性、工作记忆、注意力和执行功能表现不佳相关(所有关联p<0.001)。握力较弱与所有认知领域的较差表现独立相关(p < 0.015)。
除视觉感知外,较高水平的虚弱与所有认知领域的较差表现相关。通过考虑认知功能来描述虚弱可能有助于更好地理解虚弱。