Jagtiani Ashna, Chou Eric, Gillespie Scott E, Liu Katie, Krishnamurti Lakshmanan, McClish Donna, Smith Wally R, Bakshi Nitya
Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology-BMT, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, Dr. Nitya Bakshi is now with the Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):2364-2369. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 May 23.
The US National Pain Strategy recommends identifying individuals with chronic pain (CP) who experience substantial restriction in work, social, or self-care activities as having high-impact chronic pain (HICP). High-impact chronic pain has not been examined among individuals with CP and sickle cell disease (SCD). We analyzed data from 63 individuals with SCD and CP who completed at least 5 months of pain diaries in the Pain in Sickle Cell Epidemiology Study (PiSCES). Forty-eight individuals met the definition for HICP, which was operationalized in this study as reporting pain interference on more than half of diary days. Compared with individuals without HICP, individuals with HICP experienced higher mean daily pain intensity, particularly on days without crises. They also experienced a greater proportion of days with pain, days with healthcare utilization, and days with home opioid use and higher levels of stress. They did not have a statistically significantly higher proportion of days with crises or experience higher mean daily pain intensity on days with crises. Individuals with HICP experienced worse physical functioning and worse physical health compared with those without HICP, controlling for mean pain intensity, age, sex, and education. The results of this study support that HICP is a severely affected subgroup of those with CP in SCD and is associated with greater pain burden and worse health outcomes. The findings from this study should be confirmed prospectively in a contemporary cohort of individuals with SCD.
美国国家疼痛战略建议,将在工作、社交或自我护理活动中受到严重限制的慢性疼痛(CP)患者确定为患有高影响慢性疼痛(HICP)。镰状细胞病(SCD)合并慢性疼痛的患者中尚未对高影响慢性疼痛进行研究。我们分析了63例患有SCD和CP的患者的数据,这些患者在镰状细胞病流行病学疼痛研究(PiSCES)中完成了至少5个月的疼痛日记。48例患者符合HICP的定义,在本研究中,HICP的定义为在超过一半的日记天数中报告有疼痛干扰。与无HICP的患者相比,有HICP的患者平均每日疼痛强度更高,尤其是在无危机的日子里。他们经历疼痛的天数、使用医疗服务的天数、在家使用阿片类药物的天数比例也更高,压力水平也更高。他们出现危机的天数比例在统计学上没有显著更高,在出现危机的日子里平均每日疼痛强度也没有更高。在控制了平均疼痛强度、年龄、性别和教育程度后,与无HICP的患者相比,有HICP的患者身体功能更差,身体健康状况更差。本研究结果支持,HICP是SCD合并CP患者中受严重影响的亚组,与更大的疼痛负担和更差的健康结果相关。本研究的结果应在前瞻性的当代SCD患者队列中得到证实。