Knaapila Antti, Kantanen Katja, Ramos-Diaz Jose Martin, Piironen Vieno, Sandell Mari, Jouppila Kirsi
Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, Agnes Sjöbergin katu 2, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Humppilantie 7, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland.
Foods. 2024 May 8;13(10):1444. doi: 10.3390/foods13101444.
Faba bean is a promising source of ingredients for the production of meat analogs. However, sensory properties of faba bean, especially the bitter taste of the protein concentrate, restrict its use. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of two types of faba bean ingredients-flour (from germinated, gently heat-treated beans) and groat (from non-germinated, roasted beans)-in combination with pea protein isolate and oat fiber concentrate for producing meat analogs using high-moisture extrusion. We produced six samples using varying recipes, while maintaining constant process parameters. An untrained panel (55 participants) evaluated the samples for key sensory attributes (check-all-that-apply) and rated their pleasantness. The water absorption capacity and mechanical properties of the samples were assessed using instrumental measurements. The samples were frequently described as 'beany' and 'tasteless', but very rarely as 'bitter'. The most frequently cited attributes for mouthfeel varied between the samples containing 30% ('tough', 'gummy') and 50% ('crumbly', 'floury') of faba bean flour/groat and were associated with corresponding mechanical properties. On average, the sample containing a blend of faba bean groat and pea protein isolate (50% each) appeared to be the most pleasant. Our results suggest that faba bean groat with pea protein isolate enables the production of fibrous meat analogs with acceptable taste and texture, without the bitter off-taste.
蚕豆是生产肉类替代品的一种很有前景的原料来源。然而,蚕豆的感官特性,尤其是浓缩蛋白的苦味,限制了其应用。我们的目的是评估两种蚕豆原料——面粉(来自发芽、轻度热处理的蚕豆)和碎粒(来自未发芽、烘焙的蚕豆)——与豌豆分离蛋白和燕麦浓缩纤维相结合,使用高水分挤压法生产肉类替代品的可行性。我们采用不同配方制作了六个样品,同时保持工艺参数不变。一个未经训练的小组(55名参与者)对样品的关键感官属性(多选)进行了评估,并对其适口性进行了评分。使用仪器测量评估了样品的吸水能力和机械性能。样品经常被描述为“有豆腥味”和“无味”,但很少被描述为“苦”。在含有30%(“坚韧”“有嚼劲”)和50%(“易碎”“粉状”)蚕豆面粉/碎粒的样品中,最常被提及的口感属性各不相同,且与相应的机械性能相关。平均而言,含有蚕豆碎粒和豌豆分离蛋白(各占50%)混合物的样品似乎是最适口的。我们的结果表明,蚕豆碎粒与豌豆分离蛋白能够生产出具有可接受的味道和质地、没有苦味异味的纤维状肉类替代品。