Bruni Andrea, Battaglia Caterina, Bosco Vincenzo, Pelaia Corrado, Neri Giuseppe, Biamonte Eugenio, Manti Francesco, Mollace Annachiara, Boscolo Annalisa, Morelli Michele, Navalesi Paolo, Laganà Domenico, Garofalo Eugenio, Longhini Federico
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Radiodiagnostic Institute, Dulbecco Hospital, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 13;13(10):2871. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102871.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents a significant challenge in critical care settings, characterized by compromised gas exchange, necessitating in the most severe cases interventions such as veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) when conventional therapies fail. Critically ill ARDS patients on vv-ECMO may experience several complications. Limited data exist comparing complication rates between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients undergoing vv-ECMO. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess and compare complications in these patient cohorts. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients receiving vv-ECMO for ARDS between March 2020 and March 2022. We recorded the baseline characteristics, the disease course and complication (barotrauma, bleeding, thrombosis) before and after ECMO cannulation, and clinical outcomes (mechanical ventilation and ECMO duration, intensive care unit, and hospital lengths of stay and mortalities). Data were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. In addition, we compared survived and deceased patients. Sixty-four patients were included. COVID-19 patients (n = 25) showed higher rates of pneumothorax (28% vs. 8%, = 0.039) with subcutaneous emphysema (24% vs. 5%, = 0.048) and longer non-invasive ventilation duration before vv-ECMO cannulation (2 [1; 4] vs. 0 [0; 1] days, = <0.001), compared to non-COVID-19 patients (n = 39). However, complication rates and clinical outcomes post-vv-ECMO were similar between groups. Survival analysis revealed no significant differences in pre-vv-ECMO complications, but non-surviving patients had a trend toward higher complication rates and more pleural effusions post-vv-ECMO. COVID-19 patients on vv-ECMO exhibit higher pneumothorax rates with subcutaneous emphysema pre-cannulation; post-cannulation complications are comparable to non-COVID-19 patients.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)在重症监护环境中是一项重大挑战,其特征为气体交换受损,在最严重的情况下,当传统疗法失败时需要进行诸如静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(vv-ECMO)等干预措施。接受vv-ECMO治疗的重症ARDS患者可能会出现多种并发症。比较接受vv-ECMO治疗的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)和非COVID-19 ARDS患者并发症发生率的数据有限。这项回顾性观察性研究旨在评估和比较这些患者队列中的并发症。我们回顾性分析了2020年3月至2022年3月期间所有因ARDS接受vv-ECMO治疗的患者的病历。我们记录了基线特征、ECMO插管前后的病程及并发症(气压伤、出血、血栓形成)以及临床结局(机械通气和ECMO持续时间、重症监护病房住院时间、医院住院时间和死亡率)。对COVID-19和非COVID-19患者的数据进行了比较。此外,我们还比较了存活患者和死亡患者。共纳入64例患者。与非COVID-19患者(n = 39)相比,COVID-19患者(n = 25)气胸发生率更高(28%对8%,P = 0.039),伴有皮下气肿(24%对5%,P = 0.048),且在vv-ECMO插管前无创通气持续时间更长(2[1;4]天对0[0;1]天,P =<0.001)。然而,两组患者vv-ECMO后的并发症发生率和临床结局相似。生存分析显示,vv-ECMO前并发症无显著差异,但未存活患者在vv-ECMO后并发症发生率有升高趋势且胸腔积液更多。接受vv-ECMO治疗的COVID-19患者插管前气胸发生率更高且伴有皮下气肿;插管后并发症与非COVID-19患者相当。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-9-26
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022-6-21
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2021-11-17