Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Aug;42(8):879-894. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01386-8. Epub 2024 May 26.
The availability of increasingly advanced and expensive new health technologies puts considerable pressure on publicly financed healthcare systems. Decisions to not-or no longer-reimburse a health technology from public funding may become inevitable. Nonetheless, policymakers are often pressured to amend or revoke negative reimbursement decisions due to the public disagreement that typically follows such decisions. Public disagreement may be reinforced by the publication of pictures of individual patients in the media. Our aim was to assess the effect of depicting a patient affected by a negative reimbursement decision on public disagreement with the decision.
We conducted a discrete choice experiment in a representative sample of the public (n = 1008) in the Netherlands and assessed the likelihood of respondents' disagreement with policymakers' decision to not reimburse a new pharmaceutical for one of two patient groups. We presented a picture of one of the patients affected by the decision for one patient group and "no picture available" for the other group. The groups were described on the basis of patients' age, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and life expectancy (LE) before treatment, and HRQOL and LE gains from treatment. We applied random-intercept logit regression models to analyze the data.
Our results indicate that respondents were more likely to disagree with the negative reimbursement decision when a picture of an affected patient was presented. Consistent with findings from other empirical studies, respondents were also more likely to disagree with the decision when patients were relatively young, had high levels of HRQOL and LE before treatment, and large LE gains from treatment.
This study provides evidence for the effect of depicting individual, affected patients on public disagreement with negative reimbursement decisions in healthcare. Policymakers would do well to be aware of this effect so that they can anticipate it and implement policies to mitigate associated risks.
日益先进和昂贵的新医疗技术的出现给公共资助的医疗体系带来了巨大压力。不报销或不再报销某项医疗技术的公共资金可能成为不可避免的决定。尽管如此,政策制定者经常迫于公众的压力,对负面报销决定进行修改或撤销,因为此类决定通常会引发公众的分歧。公众的分歧可能会因媒体上发布个别患者的照片而加剧。我们的目的是评估描述受负面报销决定影响的患者对公众对该决定的不满程度的影响。
我们在荷兰的代表性公众样本(n=1008)中进行了离散选择实验,评估了受访者对决策者决定不报销一种新药物的决定的可能性,表示不同意。我们为受决定影响的其中一个患者群体展示了一张受影响患者的照片,而对于另一个群体则展示“无图片可用”。这两个群体是根据患者在治疗前的年龄、与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)和预期寿命(LE)以及治疗后的 HRQOL 和 LE 收益来描述的。我们应用随机截距对数回归模型来分析数据。
我们的结果表明,当展示受影响患者的照片时,受访者更有可能对负面报销决定表示不同意。与其他实证研究的发现一致,当患者相对年轻、在治疗前具有较高的 HRQOL 和 LE 水平以及从治疗中获得较大的 LE 收益时,受访者也更有可能对决定表示不同意。
这项研究为描述受影响的个体患者对医疗保健中负面报销决定的公众不满的影响提供了证据。政策制定者最好意识到这种影响,以便能够预测它,并实施政策来减轻相关风险。